Originally Posted by
Phosis
In your opinion.
Let's ask the millions of Japanese who bought PS2 not only because it was a game system, but because it was a DVD player, one of the contributing factors to the death of the Sega Dreamcast.
Let's ask the thousands of North Americans who bought PS3, which includes more than a few people I know (My cousin, my brother-in-law, and even my stepdad) because it has a blu-ray player. Please note, that many of these people, everyone I mentioned personally at least, do not even own a single PS3 game. It was simply the cheapest, best blu-ray they could buy at the time.
Let's ask the folks signing up with Telus Optik who now own a 360 for use primarily as a cable box.
And for myself, I bought a PS3 specifically for it's multimedia functions, including the ability to stream video and other media from my PC to my television in the other room, as well as a box for using Netflix, and of course, a blu-ray; all for the low low price of 300 dollars, much cheaper than most Netbooks and multimedia PC's.
Unfortunately, you are dead wrong on this issue. Some game companies are even reluctant to call their systems game consoles anymore, Microsoft and Sony included. Your ideal vision of how things SHOULD be is a far cry from how they ARE, and how they WILL be in the future.