Originally Posted by
EclecticGroove
Nothing about using an LED backlight would differentiate the screen from a wii u gamepad... because both would be LCD screens... and on a screen that size? I doubt your average gamer could ever notice the difference between the backlight being used unless you designed a test specifically to show them.
It also makes no difference to streaming anything... that has nothing to do with the backlight, it has everything to do with how the device accesses data. IE: network speed and ability to cache/buffer information for long enough to flawlessly handle slow/inconsistent speeds.
After that it's entirely up to the devices ability to render the video, which should be easy for anyone hardware to do in this day and age.
Novell is hardly a major player anymore... so why would they matter? For a consumer.. are they Apple? Are they Droid? Are they Microsoft? (in that order usually) No? then they they pretty much don't have a clue who they are and don't give a shit. They would not be able to port the IOS/Droid/MS apps over via emulation without the respective companies allowing it to happen. Which means they would need to have every app ported to them specifically... which would not be easy.
Likewise... what does the PSN breach have to do with anything? It's unrelated to this discussion and just about anything related to it at all. Poor corporate policy and system administration had WAY more to do with the breach than what OS they were on, likewise the breach would have been seen as less than what it was if Sony hadn't handled it so poorly... what part of any of that has anything to do with what OS Sega would pick for their magical fantasy device?
And to go into that even more, Android and IOS are both "based" on Unix, just as their parent Linux and OSX operating systems are. Even Microsoft has adopted many more Unix like features, but they still have the largest exposure, therefor the biggest target painted on them.
Even the venerable old TI calculators are finally getting color screens... so again, why would Sega waste so much money licensing a failing company to make a device with a minimal feature set? And if they were going to license a company for a far more complicated device... again, why would they go with a company in such bad shape that has very little current market appeal?
Samsung, Nokia, LG, HTC, Motorola, and any number of other companies would be a much better choice to pair up with... Or go with something smaller and custom with a memory company like Sandisk or PNY to create a fast memory device... but then again, if it's a tablet, why would it have a memory card at all? Why would they care? If it's a tablet it would be expected to have USB... so why wouldn't it just use a USB disk to transfer files locally, and ethernet/wireless otherwise?
The device you are talking about is such a bastardized mix of shitty 90's tech and "retro current" that it's doomed to fail. Partnerships with companies that were huge int he 90's and early 2000's but all but failed now, technologies that have come and gone, functionality that no longer makes sense, and an over all product identity crisis.
All of that is just a mess, and even if this device was true, it would pan out like the blackberry playbook... a device that just doesn't make sense, struggling to find just what the hell it's good for agasint superior competitors.