Yet another developer shuts their doors.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrSega

And NO, you DON'T know what "Orbi" is and what it entails. You are clueless and
oblivious to Sega's motives.

---

Problem is, so are you.

Mr. Sega:
http://badadvicefrommybrother.files....theorist-c.jpg

Quote:

---

Mr. Sega:
http://2.images.gametrailers.com/ima...wiz_mv_gt2.jpg

---

:p

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by zyrobs

Problem is, so are you.

---

The description speaks for itself.

mrsega 1986:

http://www.gizmodo.fr/wp-content/upl...ment-nerd-.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Drakon

mrsega 1986:

http://www.gizmodo.fr/wp-content/upl...ment-nerd-.jpg

---

I appreciate good humor.:p

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrSega

@Knuckles Duster. Wrong on all fronts.

---

How am I wrong?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrSega

You need to seriously do research.

---

Seriously do research into patent & IP renewal, and draw conclusions that Sega is going to release a handheld gaming tablet, partner with companies to compete with Samsung, Apple, Google in the crowded handheld tablet space?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrSega

SEGA is in great shape financially. In black. If you'd bothered to look up their financials. You'd find out your wrong.

---

Find out I'm wrong about what? By me saying they cut their spending and are more fiscally conservative than before, do you even understand what it means?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrSega

I love how you claim Vita is somehow capable of competing as a tablet, when the "portable" has proven to be a dismal FAILURE worldwide.

---

It is a traditional gaming handheld, with a touch screen and other features as good as any tablet. Enough to make gaming applications easy to implement in both markets. It's not competing as a tablet, but it's capable of running with those gaming concepts. By simply existing already, they have a leg up on this hypothetical new Sega tablet of yours.

Why is the Vita not selling? There's no demand for gaming devices like that, at the price point offered when you include the required expensive memory. Sony's to blame, as is their brand not being able to compete with Apple, Samsung, & Google. Even Nintendo is being squeezed hard by Apple's iPad being the elephant in the room, and Google's own tablets are hardly making a dent in that market.

You think Sega can compete with Apple, Google, Sony, Nintendo, and Samsung devices? Just because Sega now knows how to stop pissing away all it's money?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrSega

And NO, you DON'T know what "Orbi" is and what it entails. You are clueless and
oblivious to Sega's motives. They have several Amusment parks already, and aren't investing in another.

Thanks for debate. :)

---

Forget merchandising, forget competition, forget the notion that Sega means nothing to a lot of people in the gaming market these days.

You don't know what the Orbi is, and you're claiming Sega is going to release a gaming platform based on their newfound ability to make money and not live in debt.

It's delusional.

The ONLY way Sega will be at all relevant in a hardware market, is by doing what they did to their arcades... use standardized parts. What does that mean? That means, the only way Sega will be relevant is if they become a marquee for the Steam Box platform. What does even THAT mean? It means Sega of old is dead, and the new guys are running around with the brand, losing control to outside companies. Those Sega Laptops & the talk about diversifying markets is simple merchandising to keep the brand alive and worth selling out.

Welcome to the 21st century, MrSega.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Knuckle Duster

How am I wrong?



Seriously do research into patent & IP renewal, and draw conclusions that Sega is going to release a handheld gaming tablet, partner with companies to compete with Samsung, Apple, Google in the crowded handheld tablet space?



Find out I'm wrong about what? By me saying they cut their spending and are more fiscally conservative than before, do you even understand what it means?



It is a traditional gaming handheld, with a touch screen and other features as good as any tablet. Enough to make gaming applications easy to implement in both markets. It's not competing as a tablet, but it's capable of running with those gaming concepts. By simply existing already, they have a leg up on this hypothetical new Sega tablet of yours.

Why is the Vita not selling? There's no demand for gaming devices like that, at the price point offered when you include the required expensive memory. Sony's to blame, as is their brand not being able to compete with Apple, Samsung, & Google. Even Nintendo is being squeezed hard by Apple's iPad being the elephant in the room, and Google's own tablets are hardly making a dent in that market.

You think Sega can compete with Apple, Google, Sony, Nintendo, and Samsung devices? Just because Sega now knows how to stop pissing away all it's money?





Forget merchandising, forget competition, forget the notion that Sega means nothing to a lot of people in the gaming market these days.

You don't know what the Orbi is, and you're claiming Sega is going to release a gaming platform based on their newfound ability to make money and not live in debt.

It's delusional.

The ONLY way Sega will be at all relevant in a hardware market, is by doing what they did to their arcades... use standardized parts. What does that mean? That means, the only way Sega will be relevant is if they become a marquee for the Steam Box platform. What does even THAT mean? It means Sega of old is dead, and the new guys are running around with the brand, losing control to outside companies. Those Sega Laptops & the talk about diversifying markets is simple merchandising to keep the brand alive and worth selling out.

Welcome to the 21st century, MrSega.

---

I've made my point already. So enough has already been said.


BTW,Your multi-qouting is completely unnecessary.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrSega

I've made my point already. So enough has already been said.

---

No you haven't. You've offered an unreasonable conclusion, disregarded and refused to acknowledge rational points that conflict with it.

You tell us to read financial data about Sega's ADR value & equity, and elude to it not only somehow diffusing any critical point of their market presence or potential, but harking their return to the hardware market or their leadership of the industry toward cheaper & higher quality 3rd party game development results.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrSega

BTW,Your multi-qouting is completely unnecessary.

---

It adds emphasis to which point is being responded to. Necessary when you're jumping from one ridiculous point to another, or when attempting to deflect comments with non sequiturs.

http://i.imgur.com/eGInc.gif

Mr. Sega, are you really thirty years old?

I'm seriously just wondering...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrSega

I appreciate good humor.:p

---

Mrsega 1986:

http://www.gizmodo.fr/wp-content/upl...ment-nerd-.jpg

Mrsega today:

http://www.polyvore.com/cgi/img-thin...l&tid=55087232

Knuckle Duster please please please stop shitting on MrSega that's just plain wrong man.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Da_Shocker

Knuckle Duster please please please stop shitting on MrSega that's just plain wrong man.

---

Why not, after all Sega is coming out with a new system based on a toilet called MrSega eats a poo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 16-bit

Mr. Sega, are you really thirty years old?

I'm seriously just wondering...

---

Yes and have been a loyal SEGA fan since 1991.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Da_Shocker

Knuckle Duster please please please stop shitting on MrSega that's just plain wrong man.

---

I'm used to it. My loyalty and passion for SEGA tends to annoy some people & REALLY irritates Sonic fans, who gave up on the company years ago.