Mine has High Definition Graphics and it's 68000 HEART ON FIRE!!! :D
Printable View
Mine has High Definition Graphics and it's 68000 HEART ON FIRE!!! :D
Mine is hardcore SEGA.
Blue light and that red plastic part is also blue. :p
Nerdy? Yes, but it looks cool.
The people from Nintendo forums are laughing at us now. How can the SMS lose on a Sega forum? I voted for SMS ofcourse. NES graphics really sucks.
Because this is a forum dedicated to Sega´s 16-Bit machine, not the MS.Quote:
Originally Posted by animefan
I don't give two shits what anyone does or says on the Nintendo forums.
Because the NES was better.Quote:
Originally Posted by animefan
Large American membership with a greater familiarity with the NES than the SMS?Quote:
Originally Posted by animefan
edit NINTENDO FANS AAAA
http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/1156/onoesbj1.gif
Shut the hell up about the 'bits.'
all the bits in the world won't change the fact that the PS3 is currently inferior to the NES, Saturn, and Genesis due to the ridiculous difference in software selection.
And that's all that really matters, even if it's highly subjective.
And that's why the NES is a better console.
The SMS might have realized it's potential (as it did in Brazil, and PAL territories) in the US and Japan had it not been for Nintendo's illegal contracts.
But that wasn't the case, and there are simply more games worth investigating on the NES.
The argument of software takes you only so far. Availability of good software, for example, is a hugely limiting factor. And that's what makes the SMS even with the NES. The NES had more software, but not more easily obtainable good software.
no because upinions are more relevant then any thing else.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Smith
Availability will still net more points to the NES.
There's not nearly as many SMS games I'm interested in as there are NES games, even though the SMS has a respectable selection.
I never give opinons, only facts. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by ary incorparated
No it won't. Approximately 60% of the NES games that are easily obtainable range from barely decent to being terrible. Approximately 30% of the remaining library ranges from decent to amazing and is easily enough obtainable. The last 10% ranges all across the board and is barely attainable at all.
The SMS never had a large library, but I'd say that about 80% of it's games ranged from quite decent to amazing. Almost all of which are quite easily attainable.
heheheheQuote:
Originally Posted by Mr Smith
The NES had the better games, but the technical abilities go to the Master System. The 3-D is actually realistic and those games are quite good. Both systems have their fare share of bad games ("Great" sports series anyone), but the SMS never had a chance. If it had the same companies as the Genesis, it could have been a winner in the games. The NES gets my vote because the games are more fun, which is the point in playing a game anyways.