Where do you find this info?
Printable View
Probably Sato himself.
And so they should, SOA wanted to go with that CPU at the time SOJ were looking at the SH2 and had already dropped the NEC CPU because it wasn't good enough and yet SOA still wanted to with the 68020. And Gryson posted, the Retro gamer interview with Scott Bayless on the making of the Mega CD paints a very different picture in how SOA had early kits long before the system launched in the USA,.much like how Scott paints a very different picture to the working relationship with SOJ.
Sure they had issues with the Hardware, but CD was new tech and even the best corps can have issues and even catching fire too. Like with the Samsung note 7
Dude, they had ten candidates, I'd expect a bunch of those would be shit from sheer quantity (possibly even worse than the 68020).
Stop pulling facts out of your ass.
We don't know when and we don't know in what form did they push for the 68020. It could have been before the SH2s, it could have been after; it could have been before the Saturn as a concept existed, it could have been for a different megadrive successor, it could have been for the 32x, it could have been for the SGI system, etc.
Maybe it’s because the pint isn’t available in his area?
Seriously. There’s this little program called MS Word. You can write your comments in there and then cut and paste. It’ll really help you to be a better writer and speller.
Sato mentioned that it was a 68020, but EGM magazine said it was a 68030. The 68030 is no slouch, especially at 50Mhz.
One is hadly pulling facts out ones bottom. When the head of SEGA entire R&D confirmed that when he was looking at the SH-2, SOA were pushing for the 68020.
If Sato-san had said that SOA were pushing for the 68020 when he was looking at the NEC CPU fair enough, be he clearly says it was at the time he was looking at the SH2.
Looking over that I highly doubt the SGI guys would look to use such a rubbish CPU to power their hardware and Scott Bayless and Marty Franz confirmed that day one after the phone call from SOJ, they looked to use the SH-2 from the Saturn and its what Marty drew on the paper.
Mags are based on speculation and would also lose various info due to poor translations Ect. Who do you think would know the most. The head of SEGA R&D or a video games mag? Looking over that if we listen to you and Tom.
SEGA could have had SONY hardware, which has now been shown to be totally false and this comes from the then head of SEGA's R&D. Much like how SOJ and SOA didn't get on, or back in the early days of this board how SOJ kept SOA in the dark over the Saturn
When its clear as day, that not only did SOA know all about it and were pushing for a crappy CPU, but most of the gaming press knew of and about the Saturn.
It's pretty clear Tom a lair, but also SOA was pretty useless in making the jump to the 32Bit transition. Still to their credit they made a better development interface than SOJ.
Don't jump to conclusions. And seriously, tone down the "Tom is a liar" thing. You're only pushing people away from whatever it is you're arguing for.
There are many reasons why Sato's statements might be inaccurate, not the least of which is that he's talking about things that happened 25 years ago.