Originally Posted by
17daysolderthannes
wow, I'm going to have to put you in the "stupid" pile for that comment. Yes, the XBOX 360 is TECHNICALLY superior to the gameboy, meaning processors and the like are superior, but if someone likes dot-matrix better than hi def 3D rendered graphics, it is their opinion that the graphics are better. I was using an extreme example there, but there are many aspects of the Genesis design that DO make it technically superior in both audio and video departments. I can never argue sound from a technical perspective because thats just too subjective and as anyone can tell you, numbers don't mean crap when it comes to audio, its about synthesis and thats something you have to decide for yourself. As for graphics, the SNES can have larger sprites on screen (though Streets of Rage managed somehow), but can't move them around as fast as the Genesis can. Therefore, at least in one aspect, the graphics are superior to the SNES. Maybe you would argue that's more in the realm of gameplay, but then, again, we've delved into opinion territory. Plus, what about games like "The Red Zone" that features 3D rendered environments with no additional chips or hardware? Does software 3D rendering count as graphics? Find a clip of "The Red Zone" and tell me you've seen anything like that on the SNES without a Super FX chip. And see, I have just now further proven how subjective graphics and sound can be, you can talk tech specs all day, but its up to the player to decide what is really better graphics. You need to think outside of the box and stop being a consumer whore.
edit: oh, and for the record, I'm going to be an attorney actually :) , most likely specializing in patent or intellectual property law (kind of the same thing, but a little different).