Adams family games on multiple systems. IDK there aren't really any great movie games besides golden eye. Someone should make a nightmare on elm street game that doesn't suck. And a Halloween game that doesn't suck would be appreciated also.
Printable View
Adams family games on multiple systems. IDK there aren't really any great movie games besides golden eye. Someone should make a nightmare on elm street game that doesn't suck. And a Halloween game that doesn't suck would be appreciated also.
Iīll never understand how anyone can praise this game; it is so damn average, and has so little to do with the movies in terms of gameplay.The only decent Ghostbusters games were David Craneīs GB and GB II on GameBoy Color.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kollision
So, I hereby nominate the two!
Goldeneye and Aladdin are the two best movie games by far. Batman Returns for Snes is pretty cool too. Ok its a TV series, but the Knight Rider games for PS2 are fantastically bad, so bad they are good.
You've actually PLAYED Waterworld for the Virtua Boy?Quote:
Originally Posted by gamevet
I'd never had thought such a person existed...
Batman on the NES (damn the music is just awesome!) and Ghostbusters on the Genesis/Mega Drive are the only movie related games I like.
THE GAME IS AN AVERAGE ACTION--PLATFORMER AND IF YOU CHANGED THE SPRITES IT HAD NO CONNECTION TO GHOSTBUSTERS!Quote:
Originally Posted by JFLY
Itīs like a Chinese sprite hack of some 08/15 game!
This would describe every licensed game in existence.Quote:
Originally Posted by 108 Stars
Ahm....no.Quote:
Originally Posted by Benjamin
Just play the other GB games for example.
Yeah, I mean Batman Returns on the Sega CD...except for all the driving crap, is fairly similar to the movie is it not?
In the 16-bit era of gaming, how could a game not at some point, look like the run-of-the-mill platformer with movie sprites?
I won't put it that way. Imho, I find the game very well put together. I think Sega wasn't developing the game as direct movie licensed product, since the game wasn't released in the same time frame as the movie. I think Sega was developing the game more for the fans of the cartoon series, which was on TV at the time. But since Sega didn't use "The Real Ghostbusters" title on the actual product to differentiate itself from the movie, I can understand your point about the game not have much in common with the movie. Still, I find there are enough elements of the movie to call this a movie related title.Quote:
Originally Posted by 108 Stars
Yeah and I sold it not too long after.Quote:
Originally Posted by Phantar
I have every North American released Virtual Boy game, except for Waterworld. I probably should have kept it, for collector's sake, but the game was one of the worst I've ever played. It was pretty much poorly done ripoff of Battle Zone, with crowded screens and a horrible sense of forward movement.
The game was so bad, that I'd call the movie a masterpiece in comparison.
I have, regrettably. :p The only thing that carries the license are the sprites. Arbitrarily removing them would make the value of the license nil for any game. Hell, Fishing Derby could "play like Ghostbusters" if I were to redraw the sprites. :pQuote:
Originally Posted by 108 Stars
Star Wars games are almost always good.
Also, any early 90s Disney movie-game made by Virgin Interactive.
I agree. That got to be the best movie based game in existance.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kollision
Thats not true, I'd say that it is about 70% good games to 30% bad games. Have you ever played Star Wars: Masters of Teras Kasi? Or how about Shadows of the Empire? I hear the first Rebel Assault for Sega CD is pretty awful. Star Wars Chess has to be pretty laughable. Star Wars Obi-Wan was pretty crappy too. I have never played the Jedi Knight game though.Quote:
Originally Posted by esb09