Nah, Sega just royally scrwed up marketing in the US... that and they were at a severe disadvantage from Nintendo at the time: Nintendo OWNED Japan by 1986, so they had leverage and after they were established, they had more control over western devs too... actually to the extent of being illegal with exclusivity contracts. (which Tengen eventually won in court in the mid 90s)
The Famicom was 3 years old already with many established developers and a following in Japan, the SG-1000 Mk.I/II/SC-3000 had done very modestly by comparison (especially with 3rd parties) and the Mk.III was new and Sega had to fight an up-hill battle.
The slightly later release in EU combined with Nintendo's tardiness (especially in the UK), Sega's better marketing, and (importantly) near direct competition from home computers made it a much healthier market for Sega. (again, it was mainly the UK that was really Sega biased, Germany being the opposite -though in both cases I'd bet home computers were more popular -the ST was very strong in Germany and the UK for 16-bit computers iirc -the 8-bits for sure for the more budget side of things and the Amiga was pretty expensive until the late 80s at least)
Well the NES WAS outdated: 1983 vs 1985 hardware (namely the VDP), the sound hardware was unfortunately outdated though, and non-upgradable in the west unfortunately. (really should have added the YM2413 standard assuming it was available in 1986 -one of the cheapest if not the cheapest sound chip ever manufactured by Yamaha)In reality the Master System was an extremely competitive product which made the NES look pretty outdated, just the better graphics and Sega licences alone should've afforded the Master System a decent early market share in the US, decent enough for 3rd parties to start taking a chance and leaving Nintendo (we know hoards of companies hated Nintendo for its policies even this early, if they'd been able to they would've shifted consoles). The NES may be better all said and done, but not in all areas, and not to the stage that it deserved a monopoly of the market
Obviously graphics don't define the quality of a game alone, but with all else equal the SMS is a big win... However many arcade ports pushed harder on the SMS (to a fault in the case of Double Dragon -with the NES limiting sprite size and enemies on-screen to avoid excessive flicker -there's also control issues on the SMS iirc) and the sound was definitely weaker... again a same it lacked the FM. (even with FM PCM playback would be much weaker given the NES's hardware 7-bit DPCM playback -also possible for straight 7-bit linear PCM when used as a bare DAC, opposed to using a hack for the PSG on the SMS)Wow I'm really seeing how much better the NES was, wow, jesus, look at that!
The NES only owned 90% at it's peak ~1989/90, it was considerably less prior to that. (very split with Sega/Atari Corp/Nintendo in 1986 -sega a bit behind in part with a later release but also the most expensive and limited software and somewhat poor marketing -Atari was far more limited but lest wasteful and had a budget oriented focus with the very affordable 7800/games and downright cheap 2600 Jr, a lead for Nintendo by 1987 though not sure how much, but still in the ~70% range in 1988, tha absolute peak was ~93% some time in 1990 iirc)God knows what us Europeans were thinking when we gave the Master System a decent market shareI guess the fact that the NES didn't own 90% of our market just proves without a shadow of a doubt we were Sega biased, or maybe that Nintendo never wanted our market in the first place, yeah, thats got to be the reason why their graphically inferior, more expensive system didn't take over around here.
Ya know, with that SMS Bios screen and now my mention of the 7800, it just seems a same to leave out another psudo 3D example with awesome music:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57t83OvRdZM


I guess the fact that the NES didn't own 90% of our market just proves without a shadow of a doubt we were Sega biased, or maybe that Nintendo never wanted our market in the first place, yeah, thats got to be the reason why their graphically inferior, more expensive system didn't take over around here.
Reply With Quote





