Quantcast

View Poll Results: Which System with the games i listed.

Voters
33. You may not vote on this poll
  • GAME GEAR

    18 54.55%
  • GAME BOY

    15 45.45%
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 32

Thread: System Wars (GAME GEAR vs. GAME BOY) PART 6

  1. #16
    Rebel scum Shining Hero MrMatthews's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    La La Land
    Posts
    10,360
    Rep Power
    139

    Default

    Just post your 100-game video.

  2. #17
    Master of Shinobi Deo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Milpitas, Ca
    Age
    33
    Posts
    1,140
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    As much as I love the Game Boy for it's Pokemon games, I definitely love the Game Gear way more.
    Color, backlight, ergonomic and it doubles as a semi-portable Master System all make it better then the hand cramper Game Boy.

    Speaking of Master Systems, is Phantasy Star and other SMS games with lots of text readable/playable on the Game Gear?

  3. #18
    Done with Sega-16 (sorta) Master of Shinobi
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,636
    Rep Power
    29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alianger View Post
    So much baseless hate for the GG
    Indeed. I actually had a Game Gear years before I had a Game Boy, and it's always been one of my favorite handheld systems. It just pains me a bit to see people denounce it as a "POS" without any thought behind it.

  4. #19
    Antiquing Hedgehog Lord QuickSciFi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Age
    44
    Posts
    19,227
    Rep Power
    211

    Default

    The Game Gear had something up it's sleeve, but the screen was utter **** (Even the Majesco screen, I might add ). The truth is, when it came to handhelds, the Game Boy line ruled the world.

    P.S.> Alright, alright . It'd be a dream come true to have a "Game Gear Player" of some sort. Something that could play your Game Gear titles on the big screen. For now, I'd settle for TmEE. He's the shiznitz in that field .

  5. #20
    18daysolderthansms Outrunner Devon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Sector 5, Midgar
    Age
    37
    Posts
    581
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by QuickSciFi View Post
    The Game Gear had something up it's sleeve, but the screen was utter **** (Even the Majesco screen, I might add ). The truth is, when it came to handhelds, the Game Boy line ruled the world.

    P.S.> Alright, alright . It'd be a dream come true to have a "Game Gear Player" of some sort. Something that could play your Game Gear titles on the big screen. For now, I'd settle for TmEE. He's the shiznitz in that field .
    i caught your little comment but really the majesco screen is nice, it has better all around color then my nomad, with less shimmer and screen blur, also i have a coleco hand held thing, its susposed to have 20 game gear games built in and its really small but its broke, i really wanted to try it out and see how well the screen works.

  6. #21
    Master of Shinobi Hidden_Darkness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WI
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,470
    Rep Power
    26

    Default

    The Gamegear was my choice, I enjoyed alot more games on it during the 90's then I did on the Gameboy. I didn't start getting into the Gameboy much until the mid 90's and even then I didn't find a lot on it that I liked.

  7. #22
    Master of Shinobi Alianger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Age
    38
    Posts
    1,669
    Rep Power
    49

    Gba

    Quote Originally Posted by QuickSciFi View Post
    The Game Gear had something up it's sleeve, but the screen was utter **** (Even the Majesco screen, I might add ).
    I think the short battery life issue is a bit exaggerated, but I can't argue against this. Not that the original GB screen was much better though, unless you had that addon (light boy?) which made it look like you were in science class. I've actually played most GG/GB games on other handhelds
    One thing that has struck me is how much easier most of them are compared to console games when you have a proper screen to play them on.

    Edit:
    1. Sonic The Hedgehog (GG) > Super Mario Land (GB): A bit of an unfair comparison since Sonic is a 1991 game. It's a very good port on the GG, and later SML titles show that the GB could do much more. SML had some excellent music though.

    2. Psychic World (GG) - Metroid II (GB): Well, Psychic World is a completely broken game and not really in the same genre as Metroid. M2 is the most boring Metroid game I've played though, so I pick Wonder Boy III.

    3. Shining Force II Sword of Hajya (GG) < Legend of Zelda Links Awakening (GB): SRPG vs. Action Adventure. Why? The only serious competition to Link's Awakening I can think of is Sylvan Tale, but the game is JP only, very short and feels rushed in the late game. On the other hand, I haven't played any good SRPG on the GB.

    4. Columns (GG) < Tetris (GB): Depends what mood I'm in, but usually Tetris. There are many better puzzle games for both platforms, and many more for GB of course.

    5. Road Rash (GG) >>> Super RC Pro AM (GB): RC Pro AM on the GB was an insult to the series with no control over upgrades, lack of speed and jerky car movement. Road Rash is a great port with great music. Any good combat racers on the GB, well, Dead Heat Scramble is somewhat decent.
    Last edited by Alianger; 07-17-2010 at 11:59 AM.
    On a wave of mutilation

    https://minirevver.weebly.com/

  8. #23
    The special-needs snowman Raging in the Streets Olls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,456
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Breetai View Post
    Says the guy who also didn't give the Saturn a chance. Did you even play all the GG games mentioned in the OP? Something tells me you didn't bother...
    I haven't commented on the Saturn vs N64 thread.
    But you're right, the winner there is pretty obvious, if it weren't for the fact that we're on a sega board full of biased people.
    Also, I have played all of those games, albeit not on real hardware. Something tells me that doing that would devalue GG games even more.
    Last edited by Olls; 07-17-2010 at 02:55 PM.

  9. #24
    ToeJam is a wiener Hero of Algol Guntz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Age
    31
    Posts
    8,522
    Rep Power
    87

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ApolloBoy View Post
    Indeed. I actually had a Game Gear years before I had a Game Boy, and it's always been one of my favorite handheld systems. It just pains me a bit to see people denounce it as a "POS" without any thought behind it.
    I concur. The Game Gear is an excellent portable system. The people in here bashing the GG with no backing are no better than PS3 fanboys who hate anything that doesn't connect with HDMI.

    Also, I kind of hate to admit this, but I'm not a long time Game Gear owner. I've had mine since (I think) fall of 2008, but I've loved it ever since then. I even did a cap kit mod on it (though the sound starts acting oddly after the unit has been on for a long time). I need to grab some of the better games the system has to offer, like Wonder Boy: Dragon's Trap, Ninja Gaiden, Shinobi, Castle/Land of Illusion, Shining Force: Sword of Honolulu and other good stuff like that.

  10. #25
    18daysolderthansms Outrunner Devon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Sector 5, Midgar
    Age
    37
    Posts
    581
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    the game gear was my first sega system, i had a gameboy at the time, just like i already has a snes and n64. but finally i saw the light and bought my game gear and genesis in 1998 boy was that a good decision, iam happy to report i broke the brainwashing that nintendo had over me, looks like some people on here are still having trouble doing that.

  11. #26
    The Gentleman Thief Baloo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    5,928
    Rep Power
    110

    Default

    The Game Gear was my first portable system as well, I picked it over the mediocre Game Boy.
    Quote Originally Posted by j_factor View Post
    The Sega Saturn was God's gift to humanity. This is inarguable fact!



    Feedback Thread: http://www.sega-16.com/forum/showthr...ack&highlight=

  12. #27
    Hero of Algol kool kitty89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Age
    34
    Posts
    9,724
    Rep Power
    67

    Default

    As a console in and of itself, GG, never owned one but knew kids who did and always thought it was really cool. (and did play it a bit back then)

    However, for convenient portable on-the-go action (including multiplayer), I'd have to go with the Game Boy for the size and especially the battery life. (especially the battery life for the original model)
    6 days older than SEGA Genesis
    -------------
    Quote Originally Posted by evilevoix View Post
    Dude it’s the bios that marries the 16 bit and the 8 bit that makes it 24 bit. If SNK released their double speed bios revision SNK would have had the world’s first 48 bit machine, IDK how you keep ignoring this.
    Quote Originally Posted by evilevoix View Post
    the PCE, that system has no extra silicone for music, how many resources are used to make music and it has less sprites than the MD on screen at once but a larger sprite area?

  13. #28
    18daysolderthansms Outrunner Devon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Sector 5, Midgar
    Age
    37
    Posts
    581
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kool kitty89 View Post
    As a console in and of itself, GG, never owned one but knew kids who did and always thought it was really cool. (and did play it a bit back then)

    However, for convenient portable on-the-go action (including multiplayer), I'd have to go with the Game Boy for the size and especially the battery life. (especially the battery life for the original model)
    okay since i have seen some of your posts before you usually get technicle which hardware would be more powerful the original gameboy or the game gear, i noticed the game gear has a z80 3.58mhz and gameboy has some z80 derrivitive at 4.19mhz but i noticed it said game gear can have more onscreen sprites at once?

  14. #29
    Hero of Algol TrekkiesUnite118's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Age
    35
    Posts
    8,609
    Rep Power
    146

    Default

    Game wise I'd take the Gameboy. Playability wise I'd take the Game Gear. The Game Gear was back-lit, the Gameboy was not. I remember having such a hard time playing my Gameboy in the car due to this issue.

  15. #30
    Death Bringer ESWAT Veteran Black_Tiger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Vancouver
    Age
    46
    Posts
    5,148
    Rep Power
    125

    Default

    1. SML got old fast, so I'd probably prefer Sonic GG
    2. I haven't played Psychic World so I'll assume I'd prefer Metroid II
    3. I played Link's awakening probably more than any Zelda other than the original, but Shining Force II Sword of Hajya single handedly wins this competition with it's timeless SF gameplay that is unaffected by screen blurring.
    4. Tetris obviously
    5. I've never been a fan of Road Rash, but the NES RC Pro Am was a lot of fun.

    Like I said in the SFII/Zelda comment, all I need is a single Shining Force game to be happy indefinitely. So the Game Gear wins by a lot in this game match up.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •