Quantcast

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 86

Thread: Differences between 480i - 1080P in various PS3/360 games

  1. #16
    End of line.. Shining Hero gamevet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    10,401
    Rep Power
    143

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OldSchool View Post
    Firstly, where did that come from?
    Secondly, ummm yeah.

    Dirt 2 looks exactly the same as Dirt 1.


    My Q6600 at stock 2.4 speeds with my 88GT w/512 at stock speed kills Dirt in XP32 (2 GBs of slow 800 DDR2). Nets 30-60 just fine. I say 30-60 because Dirt 2 on my PS3 does not do a solid nonstop 60 fps, lol. It's close but it drops at times so it's the same thing, 30-60.

    That's in 1280x1024 w/4xAA, maxed DX9 settings, and V-Sync. AND that's on ooooooooooooooooooooooooooold 169.21 drivers


    wanna open your mouth again about my PC?
    No it won't. You're video card meets the minimum required specs for the pc game. Your 2.4 Ghz qc will actually perform worse than a 2.8 Ghz dual-core, since the game was designed for the dc.

    Dirt 2 was not optimized for the PS3, like many ports to the system. Wipeout HD, Oblivion, and GT5 were.
    A Black Falcon: no, computer games and video games are NOT the same thing. Video games are on consoles, computer games are on PC. The two kinds of games are different, and have significantly different design styles, distribution methods, and game genre selections. Computer gaming and console (video) gaming are NOT the same thing."



  2. #17
    Staff Writer InternalPrimate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    San Diego, California
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,847
    Rep Power
    36

    Default

    There's the Old School wit! I'd expect nothing less from someone who called "Sony" and spoke to a "manager" (was it Kevin Butler?!) and then insinuated he was a malicious liar on a Sega Genesis forum.

  3. #18
    End of line.. Shining Hero gamevet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    10,401
    Rep Power
    143

    Default

    I'm posting from my iPhone, so I'm going to posting this separate.

    I'm saying you won't get a solid 60fps in Dirt 2. Sure you can hit 60fps, when there's little on-screen action. I could get 70 fps + in Metro 2033 with DX-11, but it's not going to be more than 40 when I have a screen full of enemies.
    A Black Falcon: no, computer games and video games are NOT the same thing. Video games are on consoles, computer games are on PC. The two kinds of games are different, and have significantly different design styles, distribution methods, and game genre selections. Computer gaming and console (video) gaming are NOT the same thing."



  4. #19
    Master of Shinobi
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,190
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Oldschool, what is your ******* problem, all you ever talk about is graphics, and any other topics you are in, usually involve you bashing a game in a genre you don't even like to begin with.

    To the Admins: Providing he doesn't get banned for one reason or another, can you atleast give him the title, "I'm not Oldschool, I'm as new school as they come"?

  5. #20
    Banned by Administrators
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,317
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by InternalPrimate View Post
    Please notice me!!
    I noticed you on the last page... I suppose that wasn't good enough.

    Quote Originally Posted by gamevet View Post
    No it won't. You're video card meets the minimum required specs for the pc game. Your 2.4 Ghz qc will actually perform worse than a 2.8 Ghz dual-core, since the game was designed for the dc.

    Dirt 2 was not optimized for the PS3, like many ports to the system. Wipeout HD, Oblivion, and GT5 were.
    The hell it won't. My 88GT crushes Dirt 1... there's ZERO reason it wouldn't do the exact same thing with 2. 2 looks exactly the same.


    marginally for christs sake... what, an extra 2 fps than mine, lol




    Is there anything else you'd like me to correct you on or were you planning on adding something worthwhile to the thread?

  6. #21
    Staff Writer InternalPrimate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    San Diego, California
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,847
    Rep Power
    36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OldSchool View Post
    I noticed you on the last page... I suppose that wasn't good enough.

    Is there anything else you'd like me to correct you on or were you planning on adding something worthwhile to the thread?



  7. #22
    Banned by Administrators
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,317
    Rep Power
    0

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by InternalPrimate View Post
    I posted a 3rd time... look!
    I thrills me shitless to know that you can count to three.

    Quote Originally Posted by gamevet View Post
    No it won't. You're video card meets the minimum required specs for the pc game. Your 2.4 Ghz qc will actually perform worse than a 2.8 Ghz dual-core, since the game was designed for the dc.

    Dirt 2 was not optimized for the PS3, like many ports to the system. Wipeout HD, Oblivion, and GT5 were.


    The Minimums are 6800s for part 1&2. Part 2 has a different recommended video card than part 1 because of the added DX11 tricks that part 1 doesn't have. Because the engines are nearly identical (part 2 has some DX10/11 shit that one doesn't I suppose), the max video card needed (for DX9) for the resolution I play my PC at (1280x1024) is an 8800.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_McRae:_Dirt

    System requirements
    Minimum:
    Windows XP
    Pentium 4 @ 3.0 GHz or Athlon 64 3000+
    1 GB RAM, Graphics Card: GeForce 6800 / Radeon X1300 or above
    DirectX Compatible Sound Card
    Recommended:
    Windows XP/Vista
    Intel Core 2 Duo @ 2.66 GHz or Athlon X2 3800+
    2 GB RAM
    Graphics Card: GeForce 8800 or Radeon X1950
    Sound Card: Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Sound Card


    really? And btw, it's your, not "you are".



    dumbass
    Last edited by OldSchool; 12-03-2010 at 08:17 PM.

  8. #23
    Banned by Administrators
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,118
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OldSchool View Post
    I thrills me shitless to know that you can count to three.

    I can't spell because of my mild retardation
    Isn't it funny when people try to insult another person's intelligence yet their post has a glaring spelling error right at the fucking beginning?

    Remember kids, if you want to insult someone's intelligence, you better fucking make sure your post has no errors.


  9. #24
    Banned by Administrators
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,317
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Metal_Sonic View Post
    Isn't it funny when people try to insult another person's intelligence yet their post has a glaring spelling error right at the fucking beginning?

    Remember kids, if you want to insult someone's intelligence, you better fucking make sure your post has no errors.

    Oh wow... I forgot my t. You got me there.


    Whatever happened to all that talk you and your other butt buddies were talking months back about not instigating and starting shit for no reason with people on this board? I suppose all that talk goes out the window when you see my posts eh....

    Nice to know you can't stay away from having to be a part of my discussions.

    (I noticed you... are you satisfied now?)

  10. #25
    Staff Writer InternalPrimate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    San Diego, California
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,847
    Rep Power
    36

    Default

    Who calls people butt-buddies anymore? If you're going to call people names you might as well attempt to be clever about it.

  11. #26
    Banned by Administrators
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,317
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by InternalPrimate View Post
    Who calls people butt-buddies anymore? If you're going to call people names you might as well attempt to be clever about it.
    You again? 3 posts wasn't enough

    That or faggots... take your pick.


    I figured since a good majority of y'all are Politically Correct losers, I'd be nice and say butt buddie instead of cock sucker or fucking faggot.



    That better?

  12. #27
    Banned by Administrators
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,118
    Rep Power
    0

    Default



    Holy shit I can smell your loneliness.

  13. #28
    Staff Writer InternalPrimate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    San Diego, California
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,847
    Rep Power
    36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OldSchool View Post
    You again? 3 posts wasn't enough
    That or faggots... take your pick.

    I figured since a good majority of y'all are Politically Correct losers, I'd be nice and say butt buddie instead of cock sucker or fucking faggot.
    Well thanks for confirming my thoughts about you. Don't really know if you'll be punished here, don't really care. You're already about as low as one can go on my scale. And I've interacted with some of the legends around this board.

    Because I don't want to be an old school and just hurl ignorant slurs at people, I'll add a bit more to the topic: suggesting that developers or publishers note on a games box anything regarding AA or slight visual differences (which do not affect gameplay whatsoever) is moronic. It's so ridiculous it makes me laugh. Ignorant, stupid, and silly.

    I'm talking about your suggestion of course. In fact, I think an ignorant, stupid, silly suggestion such as that should be banned.

    The suggestion. Of course.

  14. #29
    Banned by Administrators
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,317
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Metal_Sonic View Post


    Holy shit I can smell your loneliness.
    I can't believe you just called me a nigger. You'd never say that shit to my face.


    touche... you're the one who keeps posting in 'my' thread
    Go away unless you've got something other than, "I want to be noticed in the thread" to say.

    Quote Originally Posted by InternalPrimate View Post
    Well thanks for confirming my thoughts about you. Don't really know if you'll be punished here, don't really care. You're already about as low as one can go on my scale. And I've interacted with some of the legends around this board.

    Because I don't want to be an old school and just hurl ignorant slurs at people, I'll add a bit more to the topic: suggesting that developers or publishers note on a games box anything regarding AA or slight visual differences (which do not affect gameplay whatsoever) is moronic. It's so ridiculous it makes me laugh. Ignorant, stupid, and silly.

    I'm talking about your suggestion of course. In fact, I think an ignorant, stupid, silly suggestion such as that should be banned.

    The suggestion. Of course.
    Oh noooooooooooow you want to post something in regard to what the thread is about... as opposed to coming in here trying to start shit.


    That's rich. And on top of that... your comments keep you from having any credence in this thread. You've done nothing but run your mouth since you jumped in the thread... and now that I finally reacted to you prodding me over and over again, lol... now you wanna cry like a little bitch after I react.



    Hey... I get it now.


    Some of you are ok with being bent over when it comes to purchasing things for yourself. You feel that others should also be "ok with being bent over". I get it.
    Last edited by OldSchool; 12-03-2010 at 08:51 PM.

  15. #30
    Outrunner
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    London
    Posts
    544
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    just go to a cryogenic chamber, and wake up in a few years. Surely, will be amazed with games with AAAAA efects, and whistles.... *sight*...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •