I am still watching this closely and the latest report seems to be slightly contradictory from what was posted before.
It seemed as if the owner of the dogs and the killer were one and the same. But the latest news about the tour company disputing the claims in court seem to make the killer out to be the General Manager, not the owner. There is also evidence that neither of the owners (tour company or dogs) had specified the manner to be used in the killing but the GM went ahead with his own method. The owner has actually had a very good record in the past of humane euthanising (If you believe that is possible - I make no judgement on that).
Still looks as if this General Manager is scamming the system and now the compensation board who paid him doesn't want to provide their documents on the case to the investigators. I wonder what they're trying to hide?



Reply With Quote





