Quantcast

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 36

Thread: What is your top 10 Master System, Genesis, Sega CD and / or 32 x games ?

  1. #16
    RORRING STAAAAART! Master of Shinobi FuturePrimitive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    2,300
    Rep Power
    53

    Default

    It might be easier to choose 10 games for each system! Haha.

    Reviews in the pipeline:
    Choplifter (Master System and SG-1000)
    Ys: The Vanished Omens with FM Sound Patch!

  2. #17
    Raging in the Streets A Black Falcon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Age
    41
    Posts
    3,238
    Rep Power
    44

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barone View Post
    I've said it many times before and will say it again since ABF is totally blind and will never change any of his nonsense comments: OutRunners run at the very same framerate of OutRun and Super Hang-On, which is 20 fps at max speed.
    OutRunners "plays fairly smoothly" only in ABF's mind, while the other games are "horribly choppy" in his smashed world despite all of them running at 20 fps and equally choppy. OutRunners also has terribly scratchy voices and sfx, to not talk about its reduced view distance. Oh, well.
    Um, choppyness isn't really about framerate. That's a factor, but it's not the most important one. The much bigger issue is the quality of the fake scaling, and the fake scaling in games like Super Hang-On, Outrun, Super Thunder Blade, and Space Harrier II is almost headache-inducingly terrible. The poor framerates in those games don't help either, but with smoother scrolling, they'd be much more playable. As they are though, they're some of the least fun, most disappointing games on the system. When the Master System versions of games like Space Harrier, Outrun, and Thunder Blade are significantly smoother and better-playing than the Genesis versions, you know that you have a problem. I just tried to play Super Hang-On (Genesis) again... seriously, playing that thing for too long might give me a headache, it's so horribly choppy thanks to the mediocre framerate and abysmal fake scaling.

    As for OutRunners, it's not perfectly smooth (the scaling is still a bit choppy), but it's better than the other Sega games I mentioned earlier, and when combined with the games fairly simple track designs (the focus of the challenge is on the other racer, not on the courses), it's good enough.

    Outrun 2019, though, really is in a class of its own here. It's the only one of them that actually both looks and plays legitimately well. For earlier games that play as well as that, you need to go to third parties -- as I mentioned, games like Roadblasters, or for another (not quite as good as Roadblasters or Outrun 2019, but quite decent) example Burning Force, show that you could do competent scaling on the Genesis, even in its earlier years. It's really unfortunate that it took Sega so long to figure that out.


    [Put the next ABF's wall of self-assertive text and no proof here]
    Stop being so insulting and mean, or I'll stop replying to your posts. Acting like that is not okay.

  3. #18
    Hedgehog-in-Training Hedgehog-in-TrainingOutrunner promking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Long Island New York
    Age
    37
    Posts
    649
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    1) Phantasy Star IV
    2) Streets of Rage 2
    3) Musha
    4) Sonic and Knuckles
    5) Golden Axe 2
    6) Streets of Rage 1
    7) Snatcher
    8) Sonic 2
    9) Android Assault
    10) Toe Jam and Earl 1

  4. #19
    The Gaming Gangsta Master of Shinobi profholt82's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    2,268
    Rep Power
    94

    Default

    Black Falcon,

    I agree that the original Outrun seems somewhat choppy, but that is actually similar to how the arcade game runs. I'm not sure if it is necessarily the frame rate so much as how the game plays. I think that's just how it's programmed. I like the way the car handles and the game runs. With Outrunners, I felt like the gameplay and "choppiness" was similar to Outrun, but the split screen view was not compensated for. The track just seems unforgiving and with a limited view I found the game to be not fun. I haven't played it in a few years though, so I'm going to give it another whirl soon. As for 2019, I still don't like it as much as the original, but I think it's a great game. I agree that it is smooth, but I never found Outrun to be unsmooth necessarily, so much as a little jerky, but that is part of that game's charm. It's not meant to be a silky smooth racing simulator, it's just a faithful port to a classic arcade game.

  5. #20
    Raging in the Streets A Black Falcon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Age
    41
    Posts
    3,238
    Rep Power
    44

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by profholt82 View Post
    Black Falcon,

    I agree that the original Outrun seems somewhat choppy, but that is actually similar to how the arcade game runs.
    That's not true, Genesis Outrun is much choppier than the arcade game. And a smooth port could be done -- play the (Japan-only) Turbografx version for a good comparison -- it's impressively smooth for a fake-scaling game and plays great, quite the opposite of the prettier to look at but bad to actually play Genesis version.

    I'm not sure if it is necessarily the frame rate so much as how the game plays. I think that's just how it's programmed. I like the way the car handles and the game runs.
    Outrun is a great game, yes, but the Genesis version is a poor version of the game.

    With Outrunners, I felt like the gameplay and "choppiness" was similar to Outrun, but the split screen view was not compensated for.
    Yes it was. As I said, the tracks are a lot simpler than Outrun tracks. It's not all that hard to beat Outrunners... just turn as the track starts turning in front of you, and you'll mostly be fine. The main challenge is trying to stay ahead of the other car. Sure, the game gets harder as you go, but it's never as hard as the original Outrun, and that's not all bad -- Outrun is a very difficult game. And I like the 1-on-1 versus style, it's not bad. Plus, with the computer on the screen, it can't blatantly cheat like normal computer opponents in a racing game often would! (This same benefit is seen in Top Gear -- the AI car on the lower half of the screen is the only one that doesn't cheat.)

    The track just seems unforgiving and with a limited view I found the game to be not fun. I haven't played it in a few years though, so I'm going to give it another whirl soon.
    You do have to basically start turning as soon as you can see stuff, but it is doable.

    As for 2019, I still don't like it as much as the original, but I think it's a great game. I agree that it is smooth, but I never found Outrun to be unsmooth necessarily, so much as a little jerky, but that is part of that game's charm. It's not meant to be a silky smooth racing simulator, it's just a faithful port to a classic arcade game.
    It's not at all faithful to the arcade original, in terms of smoothness or scaling. Not even close. And that makes a big impact on the gameplay -- the Genesis version is even harder than many other versions because of the choppy scaling. And I don't think anything about choppy scaling is charming. For instance, Space Harrier is one of my favorite games (see where the 32X version placed on that list, for instance), but Space Harrier 2 is probably one of the very worst games that I own for the Genesis... that was one of the first Genesis games I bought after getting the system, and it's just awful thanks to the terrible scaling. (Space Harrier for Turbografx, by the way, is reasonably smooth as expected. But even the Master System version is better than the Genesis... same as Hang-On, on the SMS v. Genesis point.)

    As for 2019, I think it's absolutely outstanding. It's probably my second favorite Outrun game overall, after only Outrun 2006... it is easier than the original Outrun (in almost any of its forms), but it's so much fun! Plus I love stuff like the multi-level roads, the turbo, etc... and of course i love futuristic racing games, so that 2019 is set in the future with futuristic cars is a big plus too. Oh yeah, and 2019 has a really good soundtrack as well! One of the series' best for sure. The only thing it doesn't have is saving to save all of those best times that you can enter in pointlessly and have vanish as soon as you turn the system off.

  6. #21
    Hero of Algol
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,315
    Rep Power
    202

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by A Black Falcon View Post
    the fake scaling in games like Super Hang-On, Outrun, Super Thunder Blade, and Space Harrier II is almost headache-inducingly terrible.
    Super Thunder Blade and Space Harrier II are far worse cases, get serious!


    Quote Originally Posted by A Black Falcon View Post
    The poor framerates in those games don't help either, but with smoother scrolling, they'd be much more playable.
    It doesn't make much sense but I wouldn't expect it to be honest.


    Quote Originally Posted by A Black Falcon View Post
    When the Master System versions of games like Space Harrier, Outrun, and Thunder Blade are significantly smoother

    You really seem to not know the meaning of "by any stretch of the imagination". 'Cause you usually go way beyond that...


    Quote Originally Posted by A Black Falcon View Post
    and better-playing than the Genesis versions, you know that you have a problem.
    Yeah, I know you have a problem.


    Quote Originally Posted by A Black Falcon View Post
    I just tried to play Super Hang-On (Genesis) again... seriously, playing that thing for too long might give me a headache, it's so horribly choppy thanks to the mediocre framerate and abysmal fake scaling.
    If the problem was the "abysmal fake scaling" it wouldn't look any good when overclocked, but (see 1:20 and on...):


    It doesn't look any abysmal IMO.


    Quote Originally Posted by A Black Falcon View Post
    As for OutRunners, it's not perfectly smooth (the scaling is still a bit choppy), but it's better than the other Sega games I mentioned earlier,
    No, it's not. Same framerate of much older games and yet a very limited fake scaling effect, especially for a 1994. SHO port is from 1989, bro.


    Quote Originally Posted by A Black Falcon View Post
    and when combined with the games fairly simple track designs (the focus of the challenge is on the other racer, not on the courses), it's good enough.
    It doesn't make much sense when talking about choppiness, but, anyway...


    Quote Originally Posted by A Black Falcon View Post
    Outrun 2019, though, really is in a class of its own here. It's the only one of them that actually both looks and plays legitimately well.
    Uh? Again, another 20 fps (at best) game. It's just toooo easy, maybe you like easy games.


    Quote Originally Posted by A Black Falcon View Post
    For earlier games that play as well as that, you need to go to third parties -- as I mentioned, games like Roadblasters,
    Roadblasters animates the road at 60 fps with no slowdowns and the animation of the player's car is just superb for a 1991 port.


    Quote Originally Posted by A Black Falcon View Post
    example Burning Force, show that you could do competent scaling on the Genesis, even in its earlier years. It's really unfortunate that it took Sega so long to figure that out.
    It's really unfortunate that you always ignore any previous discussions when you're proved wrong... OutRun 2019 was made by Sims; Burning Force by Namco, Roadblasters by Tengen... What Sega has to do with it? Nothing.


    Quote Originally Posted by A Black Falcon View Post
    Turbografx version for a good comparison -- it's impressively smooth for a fake-scaling game and plays great, quite the opposite of the prettier to look at but bad to actually play Genesis version.
    That version still suffers with a noticeable amount of slowdown though.


    Quote Originally Posted by A Black Falcon View Post
    Outrun is a great game, yes, but the Genesis version is a poor version of the game.
    Yep.


    Quote Originally Posted by A Black Falcon View Post
    Yes it was. As I said, the tracks are a lot simpler than Outrun tracks. It's not all that hard to beat Outrunners... just turn as the track starts turning in front of you, and you'll mostly be fine. The main challenge is trying to stay ahead of the other car. Sure, the game gets harder as you go, but it's never as hard as the original Outrun, and that's not all bad -- Outrun is a very difficult game. And I like the 1-on-1 versus style, it's not bad. Plus, with the computer on the screen, it can't blatantly cheat like normal computer opponents in a racing game often would! (This same benefit is seen in Top Gear -- the AI car on the lower half of the screen is the only one that doesn't cheat.)
    You do have to basically start turning as soon as you can see stuff, but it is doable.
    Good points but Outrun isn't all that difficult IMO. It's a pretty simple and pretty short game.


    Quote Originally Posted by A Black Falcon View Post
    the Genesis version is even harder than many other versions because of the choppy scaling.



    Quote Originally Posted by A Black Falcon View Post
    As for 2019, I think it's absolutely outstanding. It's probably my second favorite Outrun game overall, after only Outrun 2006... it is easier than the original Outrun (in almost any of its forms), but it's so much fun! Plus I love stuff like the multi-level roads, the turbo, etc... and of course i love futuristic racing games, so that 2019 is set in the future with futuristic cars is a big plus too. Oh yeah, and 2019 has a really good soundtrack as well! One of the series' best for sure. The only thing it doesn't have is saving to save all of those best times that you can enter in pointlessly and have vanish as soon as you turn the system off.
    The multi-level roads are impressive in some ways for the time and hardware... I also dig the soundtrack.



    Well, anyway, here are my lists (with games I can easily remember now, without looking at a complete list of releases):
    Mark III/Master System
    1) Wonder Boy III: The Dragon's Trap
    2) Kenseiden
    3) R-Type
    4) Alex Kidd in Shinobi World
    5) Super Racing

    Mega Drive/Genesis
    1) Bare Knuckle II
    2) Sonic 3 & Knuckles
    3) Flashback
    4) Splatterhouse 3
    5) Phantom 2040

    Mega CD/Sega CD
    1) Snatcher
    2) Pitfall: The Mayan Adventure
    3) Out Of This World
    4) Keio Flying Squadron
    5) Popful Mail

  7. #22
    Road Rasher
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Age
    44
    Posts
    423
    Rep Power
    14

    Default

    In no order

    Genesis
    Streets of Rage 2
    Road Rash 2
    Sub Terrania
    Golden Axe
    Sonic 2
    Streets of rage 1
    Pitfall (only version I have)
    Mickey mania
    Gunstar Heroes
    Pier solar

    32x
    Stellar Assault
    starwars arcade
    Metal head
    Virtua racing deluxe
    virtua fighter
    Cosmic carnage

    Sega CD
    Flink
    popful mail
    chuck rock 2
    lunar
    lunar 2
    Eternal Champions
    earthworm Jim
    Soul Star
    Last edited by madmax2069; 03-09-2013 at 08:24 AM.

  8. #23
    Banned by Administrators
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,592
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Great lists guys ! As I said before yeah you can do top 10 games (or w/e) for each "system" or overall, no problem.

  9. #24
    I remain nonsequitur Shining Hero sheath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Age
    46
    Posts
    13,331
    Rep Power
    134

    Default

    At the fake scaling discussion, I think for 16-bit consoles all that was needed to successfully fake scale sprites was around seven frames at different sizes tastefully done. Super Hang On overclocked shows this quite well, the screen is fast enough that you have to frame advance to see that the sprites have jumps between sizes. Similarly, if they were software scaled at 8-10 FPS they would jump as well. I don't know how many frames Super Mario Kart uses for the carts, but it isn't much more than 8 frames.

    Even in games with proper object scaling like BC Racers they just used 15 frames of animation to show sides of bridges or the Dinosaur Skeleton in real time, making the objects appear 3D.
    "... If Sony reduced the price of the Playstation, Sega would have to follow suit in order to stay competitive, .... would then translate into huge losses for the company." p170 Revolutionaries at Sony.

    "We ... put Sega out of the hardware business ..." Peter Dille senior vice president of marketing at Sony Computer Entertainment

    "Sega tried to have similarly strict licensing agreements as Nintendo...The only reason it didn't take off was because EA..." TrekkiesUnite

  10. #25
    Raging in the Streets A Black Falcon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Age
    41
    Posts
    3,238
    Rep Power
    44

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barone View Post
    Super Thunder Blade and Space Harrier II are far worse cases, get serious!
    Space Harrier II? I said in one of the posts you're quoting from that I think that's one of the worst games I own for the Genesis, so I think my opinion on that one is clear... yes, it is even worse than Super Hang-On, sure. But that doesn't mean Super Hang-On is good.

    It doesn't make much sense but I wouldn't expect it to be honest.
    What? Um, how smooth a games' scaling is is very important for how playable the game is!


    You really seem to not know the meaning of "by any stretch of the imagination". 'Cause you usually go way beyond that...

    Yeah, I know you have a problem.
    Those Master System versions are a lot less choppy than the Genesis versions, and play more smoothly. I have no idea what framerates they run at or stuff like that, I've never been much of a judge for framerates, I just know that they are not painfully choppy -- the scaling doesn't look as bad, etc. I think that the simpler graphics help, probably... of course it varies somewhat from game to game on the SMS too, but for Hang-On particularly, the SMS version is fun and playable, while the Genesis version is painful to look at for any length of time.

    If the problem was the "abysmal fake scaling" it wouldn't look any good when overclocked, but (see 1:20 and on...):


    It doesn't look any abysmal IMO.
    Eh, I'd say that the scaling does still look bad at 12Mhz. I like that it alleviates some of the horribly slow gameplay, which is also an issue with the game at standard speed, but that scaling is not as good as, say, the TG16 fake-scaling games, or Outrun 2019 either, and that difference is definitely noticeable. But sure, the speed boost does help the game -- the game's way too slow, and badly needed the speed boost.

    No, it's not. Same framerate of much older games and yet a very limited fake scaling effect, especially for a 1994. SHO port is from 1989, bro.
    I would agree that considering that it's 1994 they probably could have done an even better job than they did, but there's a definite difference between Outrunners and the fake-scaler games from 1989-91. I have no idea about the framerate, but the scaling is better.

    It doesn't make much sense when talking about choppiness, but, anyway...
    Well, with the short draw distance you have in Outrunners (and the could-be-better speed of the game), if the courses were really hard and required lots of memorization, it'd be much more frustrating... but it's not like that.

    Uh? Again, another 20 fps (at best) game. It's just toooo easy, maybe you like easy games.
    I don't know why you keep talking about framerate as if that's the only factor that matters, but as I said, it isn't. In terms of graphics, scaling, smoothness, etc., Outrun 2019 is so much improved over the original that it's kind of impressive that it's actually on the same system...

    As for the games' difficulty, a harder difficulty level might be nice, but the game is way too much fun for that to bother me much.

    Roadblasters animates the road at 60 fps with no slowdowns and the animation of the player's car is just superb for a 1991 port.
    Yeah, it looks amazing. I was expecting something like the Sega fake-scaler games on the Genesis, but it's almost as good as the arcade original! If only Sega had had that engine too, or one that good...

    It's really unfortunate that you always ignore any previous discussions when you're proved wrong... OutRun 2019 was made by Sims; Burning Force by Namco, Roadblasters by Tengen... What Sega has to do with it? Nothing.
    Um, I never said here that those games were made by Sega. I only said that they were games on the Genesis, and to expand on that are examples of the kind of thing that Sega could, and should, have been able to do too, had they worked harder at their fake-scaling routines.

    That version still suffers with a noticeable amount of slowdown though.
    Perhaps so, but the smooth fake scaling and solid speed make the game a lot more fun to play than the Genesis version. It's too bad they didn't release it in the US. Heck, even Power Drive is kind of impressive on TG16... I'm not sure if it actually should have been released, considering how it plays, but it's amazing that they managed to get it to function at all.

    As for other racing games on that system, Victory Run has simpler graphics than that, but looks and plays great. The fake scaling is quite competently done too. It's too bad that that was one of the only racing games Hudson ever made, they showed with it that they could make a pretty good (if VERY difficult) one.

    Yep.
    We agree on that then.

    Good points but Outrun isn't all that difficult IMO. It's a pretty simple and pretty short game.
    I've always found Outrun a pretty tough game... you really need to memorize the game to get through it.

    The multi-level roads are impressive in some ways for the time and hardware... I also dig the soundtrack.
    Yeah. I like the transparent track parts, the parts with double-wide highways, etc. too. Lots of impressive stuff going on in the environments, and the gameplay's just as good.
    Last edited by A Black Falcon; 03-09-2013 at 04:42 PM.

  11. #26
    The Gaming Gangsta Master of Shinobi profholt82's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    2,268
    Rep Power
    94

    Default

    I was looking through an old Sega Visions, and came across this review (based on a 5 Sonic scale). It looks like they agree that OutRunners kind of sucks ass.

  12. #27
    Angry Liberal Arts Major Hero of Algol Iron Lizard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Bisbee, AZ
    Age
    44
    Posts
    7,861
    Rep Power
    113

    Default

    Ghouls 'N Ghosts
    Revenge of Shinobi
    Gunstar Heroes
    Snatcher
    Lunar SS
    Lunar EB
    Castle of Illusion
    Shinobi III
    Quackshot
    Strider

  13. #28
    Outrunner Splatterhouse5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    North Jersey
    Posts
    651
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    01. Streets of Rage 2
    02. Shining Force 2
    03. Shining Force CD
    04. Snatcher
    05. Phantasy Star 4
    06. Castlevania Bloodlines
    07. Lunar 2
    08. Landstalker
    09. Toejam and Earl
    10. Alien 3

  14. #29
    Banned by Administrators
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,592
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Great lists, awesome scan prophet, I used to get that magazine sent to my house. When Sega people give a Genesis game a review like that, that says something. But if the guy likes the game, cool.

    Honorable mentions for my list would be Wolfenstein 32 x (Chilly), Silpheed (when the game decides to go past title screen) and Terminator CD.

  15. #30
    Banned by Administrators
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,592
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    I saw many Lord of Thunder CD mentions on lists. I heard the TG CD version was way better than Sega CD version. Is that true ?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •