7.9.2013 the BIG day for SEGA.

[MrSega]

You get a rep because Humphrey Bogart is a badass.

Here's looking at you, Sega Kid.

[MrSega]

I'm currently monitoring Sega's Trademark office and will be watching for them to start registering domain names this week.

The shareholder's meeting is set for this Tuesday in Japan. We should start seeing the first round of Sega "Orbi" news this coming week. With the BIG day of course being July 9,2013.

"Orbi Joypolis Zoo", "Orbi Network", "Orbi Amusements".

[MrSega]

http://www.segasammy.co.jp/english/p...13_final_e.pdf

What the HELL is "Sega Entertainment Corporation"? I cannot find ANY info on it or what it refers to.

"Renewal Opening of Tokyo Joypolis July 14,2012" This explains the Indoor Zoo. SEGA still owns the Yokohama property and is restructuring it. The Investors flier doesn't refer to The Indoor Zoo as "Orbi" at all. It refers to it as "SEGA/BBC Earth. The shape-shifting "ORBI" logo can be seen in the background.

http://www.bbcearth.com/about/

"Activity develop into new fields(advanced facilities, opening of NEW business facilities.)

"Establishment of a BBC facility in Japan and development for the worldwide license-out business".

"Growth through horizontal development of strong IPs and securing of new earning opportunities".


I think we may have FINALLY unlocked the "ORBI" mystery. It's a multi-license, Franchising Enterprise brand.



http://www.dummies.com/how-to/conten...sss-brand.html

http://www.genomicslawreport.com/ind...usiness-model/

So, I'm right all along.


"Orbi" is being formed through multiple,investors, business partnerships and joint ventures, BBC is the first Joint Venture partner.

[Semmie]

http://www.segasammy.co.jp/english/p...13_final_e.pdf

What the HELL is "Sega Entertainment Corporation"? I cannot find ANY info on it or what it refers to.

"Renewal Opening of Tokyo Joypolis July 14,2012" This explains the Indoor Zoo. SEGA still owns the Yokohama property and is restructuring it. The Investors flier doesn't refer to The Indoor Zoo as "Orbi" at all. It refers to it as "SEGA/BBC Earth. The shape-shifting "ORBI" logo can be seen in the background.

http://www.bbcearth.com/about/

"Activity develop into new fields(advanced facilities, opening of NEW business facilities.)

"Establishment of a BBC facility in Japan and development for the worldwide license-out business".

"Growth through horizontal development of strong IPs and securing of new earning opportunities".


I think we may have FINALLY unlocked the "ORBI" mystery. It's a multi-license, Franchising Enterprise brand.



http://www.dummies.com/how-to/conten...sss-brand.html

http://www.genomicslawreport.com/ind...usiness-model/

So, I'm right all along.


"Orbi" is being formed through multiple,investors, business partnerships and joint ventures, BBC is the first Joint Venture partner.

ok so let me just say that you are right
for the sake of this argument.

then orbi could most possible be sega orbi as it is now. or sega could drop the name sega and make it the orbi enterprise.

u got 3 days 4 tops btw.

[Moirai]

It will be hilarious if MrSega is right all along, I wonder what all his naysayers would do?

[MrSega]

ok so let me just say that you are right
for the sake of this argument.

then orbi could most possible be sega orbi as it is now. or sega could drop the name sega and make it the orbi enterprise.

u got 3 days 4 tops btw.

The investment flier indicates that SEGA will still be "SEGA" they'll just use the "ORBI" brand like "CSK".

[Thierry Henry]

It will be hilarious if MrSega is right all along, I wonder what all his naysayers would do?

[MrSega]

It will be hilarious if MrSega is right all along, I wonder what all his naysayers would do?

Remember a couple of months ago when Zachary Morris dropped the tip that Toshiba was being selected as a joint venture partner of SEGA to help run their "Home Hardware division"?

Wouldn't it be funny if its that he was telling the truth?

Also I find it very suspicious that all of SEGA's NEW business strategies are being discussed under "Amusement Machine Business" could it be that they're referring to what their core market is?

[MrSega]

Repped.

I'm becoming more confident all those who called me a troll will coming crawling on their knees that day and will be kowtow to me.

[Semmie]

It will be hilarious if MrSega is right all along, I wonder what all his naysayers would do?

it is the exact reason why i rather stay neutral on that matter. there is potential in what he said. u can find fact. but the problem is that they are mixed with speculations.
i dont doubt him nor do i believe him. this should be the approach i think.

[MrSega]

it is the exact reason why i rather stay neutral on that matter. there is potential in what he said. u can find fact. but the problem is that they are mixed with speculations.
i dont doubt him nor do i believe him. this should be the approach i think.

I have absolutely no problem with that. I just resent being called a "liar" or "I'm wrong" when they can't prove it themselves or don't even want to try to prove me wrong.

[Moirai]

it is the exact reason why i rather stay neutral on that matter. there is potential in what he said. u can find fact. but the problem is that they are mixed with speculations.
i dont doubt him nor do i believe him. this should be the approach i think.

I agree.

[Semmie]

I have absolutely no problem with that. I just resent being called a "liar" or "I'm wrong" when they can't prove it themselves or don't even want to try to prove me wrong.

u have to understand that people only accept sega as a console. not as a game developer. ok well uhm more like yeah they will buy a sega game if its good, and knowing that it is from sega might motivate people to buy it. but it is a big hole in yer wallet to buy three systems 5 if u count ios and handhelds is 6 to have literally all the present and future sega games.

do u actually know when dreamcast died loads of gamers died with it. it was only the sega fanboyism that kept them playing games. and when dreamcast died they basically vanished. sega may have good times. but a sudden death is very near. cause sega is simply only accepted as define when it has the console.

because there is no console the whole fans got shattered.
and so therefor i say that to sustain the sega fanbase sega should make a console
it is a mandatory

sega is so so insecure in making one. but they should worry more if they are not making one at all.
in worst case scenarion sega will be history and sonic will get a nintendo brand. and we all know damn well if sonic gets a nintendo brand he will become nintendo alike and his coolness will slowly fade into oblivion and sonic will become mario alike and tails will be a gaylord.

blablabla but speaking of what you say. we all want this so bad including those who hate you for saying things. but u have to understand their sentiment.

it is better not to believe u and if it turns out right they can be happy
if they believe you and your wrong they wiill hate you even more than now cause they get dissapointed

all those peeps ask u is for raw material and u cant blame them

[MrSega]

u have to understand that people only accept sega as a console. not as a game developer. ok well uhm more like yeah they will buy a sega game if its good, and knowing that it is from sega might motivate people to buy it. but it is a big hole in yer wallet to buy three systems 5 if u count ios and handhelds is 6 to have literally all the present and future sega games.

do u actually know when dreamcast died loads of gamers died with it. it was only the sega fanboyism that kept them playing games. and when dreamcast died they basically vanished. sega may have good times. but a sudden death is very near. cause sega is simply only accepted as define when it has the console.

because there is no console the whole fans got shattered.
and so therefor i say that to sustain the sega fanbase sega should make a console
it is a mandatory

sega is so so insecure in making one. but they should worry more if they are not making one at all.
in worst case scenarion sega will be history and sonic will get a nintendo brand. and we all know damn well if sonic gets a nintendo brand he will become nintendo alike and his coolness will slowly fade into oblivion and sonic will become mario alike and tails will be a gaylord.

blablabla but speaking of what you say. we all want this so bad including those who hate you for saying things. but u have to understand their sentiment.

it is better not to believe u and if it turns out right they can be happy
if they believe you and your wrong they wiill hate you even more than now cause they get dissapointed

all those peeps ask u is for raw material and u cant blame them

In the worse year of the 2000s "2001" alot of tragedies and bad things happened. Dreamcast's being discontinued and SEGA's departure from the hardware business was a surreal moment. A MAJOR event in gaming that struck a huge core. For gaming it marked the end of an era. For SEGA fans, it was a crisis that could have been averted and for history its the lesson In the OP-ED I wrote that SEGA's hard lesson learned during the CSK years about pragmatism and management. Here's an excerpt from it:


"The approach to investments and marketing is a fickle thing. Investment groups depend heavily on investors to make the right moves and right calls. Sometimes putting all your eggs in one basket can either hurt you or bring down your entire company. In SEGA's case, the CSK years was a lesson in pragmatism, learning to stay gold,careful and conservative. That you must handle your core market with care and cautiousness. The one takeaway of success from that era is that SEGA learned that they had something other Arcade veteran brands didn't, the ability to successfully stay healthy as a home game console brand, and stronger gaming talent that made them the World Arcade leaders. The failure was taking that for granted and being too overambitious about their 1st party consumer brand, too one-sided on how to run its console brand and too overzealous about its core Arcade market."


SEGA became both a shell of its former self and a completely disorganized brand in 2002. The problem is, that people still see them the same way. It's not surprising at all. Back in the mid/late 00s, Simon Jeffery was very lackluster at his job and had a poor way of explaining things. When you watch the old 2008 Kotaku video, it appears as if Jeffery's words were hurtful and stung bad.(I imagine it stung the heart really really bad because the Dreamcast 2 rumors had first stemmed from when Sega had re-filed the "Dreamcast" trademark in 2007.) but when you think about it, Jeffery wasn't wrong. He was basically stating at the time SEGASammy's business stance. He just went about in the wrong and albeit mean spirited attitude.

Mike Hayes was a joke. Nothing but a Xenophobic British tool. His attitude in 2010 regarding "Sega Console rumors" was pure venomous,pompous,self-righteous rhetoric towards how HE felt towards SEGA as a company not a reflection on who they were. Hayes created a stigma over Europe on Sega's brand. The modest success of SOE as a publisher has been both a blessing and a curse for SEGA. Its why UK SEGA fans REFUSE to believe SEGA will ever make hardware again. It makes perfect sense why SEGA fired his ass last year ahead of the Wii U's launch and why soon after, they shut down all those in-house European software studios created under his tenure. Hayes pretty much threw everyone else under the bus for the UK market.(Generations being released behind MW3 and the lack of the Anniversary bundle was entirely Hayes' fault. (I read somewhere that Naoya Tsurumi personally terminated Hayes himself).

As for Sonic Lost World, its starting to make more and more sense on why it's a Wii U exclusive and why the supporting Cast is being spared from this travesty. Lost World is a straight up X-Treme remake but retooled and with some added elements of Mario Galaxy. The more I read about the story and see its gameplay, the more and more confident I am that it will only be brought by Nintendrones and be a niche hit.(Hell, there's reason to believe it'll be counted as mediocre crap that will thankfully KILL that dumbass myth that Sonic only sells on Nintendo) I'm also convinced, SEGA knew very well, dumping an unoriginal, non cutting edge Sonic game on a failing console like Wii U would only help them and make Nintendo look desperate. Wii U is still failing at that the lack of 3rd party support is going to drive it further into the ground.

Also the Sonic franchise is a mess. It needs to be re-organized. I believe SEGA is trying to use Jump and Dash to find newer consumers and so they can gather enough of them to dump the furry,man-child assholes that run the fanbase today.

[Semmie]

According to ang see link
http://forums.sega.com/showthread.ph...40#post8067240
U were the one bringing the spectrum hoax.