Comparative audio recordings
of the Genesis/Megadrive consoles.
By MaxWar.
Intro: What are we comparing exactly?
In this thread I will be doing recordings of my Genesis consoles for sound quality comparison purpose. My aim with this is to end speculation and instead compare various consoles and mods with the help of standardized recordings. I initially started this to see how the Crystal Clear Audio Mod board I bought would compare on different genesis revisions. In the end I decided to make a thread that could be updated with whatever genesis related sound comparison experiments I do in the future.
So far we have recordings from stock Model 1 console. Mostly from My recapped VA3, but also a few from a VA6
I have recordings of some stock model 2, mostly VA4, because it is apart from the other model 2.
Most of my recordings though are with the CCAM.
I have made most of my CCAM recordings with the RetroGamer CCAM board, which has a lowpass filter to make it sound closer to a model 1 genesis.
I have compared most CCAM ready consoles with this setup. Namely M1VA7, M2VA1 and M2VA4. I am missing 2 ASIC variants altogether. One from Late model 3 and the one from Nomad.
I have also modified my RetroGamer CCAM board to comply with Tiido's original plan, those are far less filtered and in my opinion show how a CCAM should sound like, Those recordings have the tag - Original - on them.
You will also notice some of the Files have the -YM3438CCAM- label. Those are from a model 1 modified to use the Discrete YM3438 sound chip. This has been found to be just as good as using a model 2 for CCAM purpose. As shown in this blind test study.
http://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=36417
About comparative sound recordings: <- You can skip this if not interested in the technicalities.
I like to do sound quality comparisons with recordings, Ive been doing them in the past on various occasions.
Most record based sound comparisons attempts I see are flawed because they use improper and/or inconsistent recording methods and inadequate media. ( I do not consider youtube an adequate media )
Those things are a prerequisite if you want the experiment to yield conclusive data.
I have written a guide about my standardized method for doing comparative recordings. https://sites.google.com/site/soundc...cording-method
Is this method absolute or perfect? I will never claim it is, but It gives a consistent result and aims at capturing the source as is. I can record a console once, then do it 6 months later and the recordings will sound exactly the same.
I will add a couple details that are not in this guide, more specific to recording consoles.
1.Do not record while the console is connected to a live CRT TV. Turn off the CRT before the record or it will induce a characteristic high pitched interference. I learned the hard way as earlier recordings I have made suffer from this.
I have not tested this with LCD screens, It is probably ok but I have not tested and would still turn it off just in case.
2. I use a Behringer HD400 ground loop isolator device for my recordings: Ive pondered if this was a good idea or not as It can help filter out part of the interferences generated on ground level by the source. But I will tell you why I use it and why I think it is a good idea.
-It does not affect the sound signal itself.
-If the source you are recording produces electrical interferences on the signal itself, it will not filter that out.
-It will remove interferences from outside and variable sources and you dont want those. Once the recording is done, those may be mistaken for a problem of the source, which may not be the case.
-Basically it is just one more precaution into making the results more consistent.
*A ground isolator should not be used as an easy fix. It should not be used without first trying to limit interferences in any conventional way ( keep cables short, away from AC lines, turn off nearby noise generating devices like CRT etc.. )
Recordings:
I decided to organize this on a per song basis. I pick up tracks by their ability to reveal key differences or problems in the sound, or simply because they are somewhat classic. This step is arbitrary and I may decide to stop using some tracks or start using some new ones in the future. But I will try to keep some standards. So far I only used original games I own, I have no flash cart anyway.
-Dungeons&Dragons: Warriors of the eternal sun: Valley 1
This is in my opinion one of the best track to make Genesis sound comparison and it is why I place it first. If you should want to download only one series, I recommend this one.
-It shows a good difference between YM2612 and YM3438
-It is great for showing what I believe to be YM2612 DAC artifacts.
-It is a quiet sound track, which means you need to up the input volume more than other games, this is great for comparing background noise levels. Some genesis games will output pretty loud audio, effectively drowning out noise problems.
-It makes good use of PCM drums
DnD-Valley1-M1VA3.flac *This recording has CRT whine noise due to connected CRT.
DnD-Valley1-M1VA6.flac
DnD-Valley1-stock-M2VA3
DnD-Valley1-CCAM-M1VA7.flac
DnD-Valley1-CCAM-M2VA1.flac
DnD-Valley1-CCAM-Original-M2VA1.flac
DnD-Valley1-CCAM-M2VA4.flac
DnD-Valley1-YM3438CCAM-M1VA3.flac
DnD-VALLEY1-YM3438CCAM-Original-M1VA3.flac
Observations:
-I consider the two YM2612 (M1VA3, M1VA6) versions to be practically identical minus the CRT noise on the VA3 one, a mistake on my part. ( its an older recording)
-On the CCAM boards, noise is revealed on the M1VA7 and the M2VA1. I left a split second of silence in the beginning and you can hear the parasites. It is a bit worse on the VA7. By contrast on the M2VA4 noise is extremely low. On the old Model 1, both stock and modified with CCAM, noise is also pretty tame but you still have a constant background hiss that is always there.
- You can notice with the flute that PSG in M2VA4 is a bit weaker.
-This track is interesting to appreciate the difference between YM2612 and YM3438. You can hear some artifacts on the YM2612. Those are caused by the Digital to analog conversion and it seems to actually play a significant role on how this track sounds.
*I personally prefer this track on the original Model 1 with YM2612. Despite, or maybe actually because of the artifacts, The YM2612/model 1 dense and slightly overdriven output plays well with this track by making it sound more "full". By contrast one can appreciate how dry and precise the CCAM is. Everything is cut razor sharp. It affects the PCM drums that I find to blend in less well than with the model 1 YM2612.
-Thunder Force IV : Fighting Back - Stage 1-A
This is a staple of genesis music and also included in one of Tiido's original demo file. Hearing Tiido's recording of this is what initially made me want to get a CCAM. It is also one of the good tracks to compare the relative level of FM vs PSG. Just as the song begins, the fast arpeggio wave line is done with the PSG.
Tiido's original demo.
TFIV-levela1-VA3(postrecap).flac *This recording has CRT whine noise due to connected CRT.
TFIV-level1A-M1VA6.flac
TFIV-level1a-CCAM-M2VA3
TFIV-level1a-CCAM-M1VA7.flac
TFIV-level1A-CCAM-M2VA1.flac
TFIV-level1-CCAM-Original-M2VA1.flac
TFIV-level1A-CCAM-M2VA4.flac
TFIV-Level1A-YM3438CCAM-M1VA3.flac
TFIV-LEVEL1A-YM3834CCAM-Original-M1VA3.flac
Observations:
-Here you have Tiido's original CCAM recording along with my own both in Original and filtered form. You can appreciate how my -original- Recording is very similar to Tiido's. The RetroGamer's CCAM strong Lowpass contrasts sharply however.
-This song is a good example to appreciate how the PSG is weaker in the M2VA4 than on its other CCAM counterparts. The VA7 seems a bit weaker than the VA1 too but the difference is small. It seems clear to me that the installation of a CCAM on a M2VA4 might require a fix to restore a more proper PSG level.
-Mega Turrican Intro
I choose this one because it is from a very high quality OST for the genesis and the intro is also one of the original sample recorded by Tiido for his CCAM mod.
Tiido's original Demo.
MT-Intro-Stock-M1VA7
MT-Intro-Stock-M2VA3
MT-Intro-CCAM-M1VA7.flac
MT-Intro-CCAM-M2VA1.flac
MT-Intro-CCAM-Original-M2VA1.flac
MT-Intro-CCAM-M2VA3
MT-Intro-CCAM-M2VA4.flac
MT-Intro-YM3438CCAM-M1VA3
MT-INTRO-YM3834CCAM-Original-M1VA3.flac
Observations:
-If you listen to Tiido's orginal CCAM recordings, you will notice that the cymbal is not distorted. Both my standard and filtered CCAM recordings have the cymbal distortion. I cannot explain why at this moment but I notice that the music on Tiido's version is slightly slower and lower pitch. Might be something to do with console localization.
-Also, Once again, the silences between parts in the intro reveal audible background/processing noise in the VA7 and VA1. The VA4 CCAM is however very clean.
-Slightly weaker PSG in VA4 is again noticable.
*I do not have a model 1 YM2612 recording of this atm but I prefer the more filtered retrogamer's CCAM version over Tiido's original this time. There is too much highs already in there and more filtering actually helps it i think. Tiido's sample, while it sounds good, is pretty ear piercing. I think a in-between would be ideal here.
-Mega Turrican Level 1
I really like this song so this is probably why I recorded it when I did my Postrecap M1VA3 recording last year.
I did the recording with the CCAM VA7 as an afterthough To have a comparison between a stock YM2612 console and a CCAM
-See upper links for Tiido's original demo.
MT-Level1-VA3(postrecap).flac *This recording has CRT whine noise due to connected CRT.
MT-level1-CCAM-M1VA7.flac
Observations:
*I think Tiido's original demo sounds too heavy on the treble here, just like for the previous track.
However I think this is a tough call between old Model 1 and my retrogamer's CCAM. I feel this can be equally enjoyable on my CCAM or original Model1. It comes out well on both. The CCAM superior definition and separation makes it good in a way, while the model 1 higher saturation and sound pressure makes it enjoyable in another. I cant really decide on this one, I guess it depends on your mood
-Biohazard Battle - Level1
I picked this one up because it makes some interesting use of a yamaha YMxxxx chip. Lots of envelopes and special effects makes it a good candidate to check for nuances between versions of the chip. I also like this OST for its unique insectoid creepy style
BHB-BA3(postrecap).flac *This recording has CRT whine noise due to connected CRT.
BHB-level1-CCAM-M1VA7.flac
BHB-Level1-CCAM-M2VA1.flac
BHB-Level1-CCAM-M2VA4.flac *This recording has CRT whine noise due to connected CRT.
Observations:
-Despite my original intention of finding subtleties between YM2615 and YM3438 with this one, It did not really happen. As far as i have noticed the execution is pretty faithfull on both chips.
-However this track turns out to be pretty good at illustrating the craps and artifacts out the Model 1 ym2612. Just compare the first few seconds between any CCAM and the ym2612.
* I prefer CCAM on this one, Sound tends to come slightly overdriven and grainier on the stock Model1 ym2612. This music is already a bit rough and grainy to begin with so I think It comes out more pleasant on my CCAM recordings.
-Contra Hard Corps - GameStart
I chose to use this as I thought this game has it easy to make your ears bleed with all those cray cray explosion sounds.
The music with its distorted-electronic vibe is also an interesting study subject
CHC-Gamestart-M1VA6.flac
CHC-Gamestart-CCAM-M1VA7.flac
CHC-gamestart-CCAM-M2VA1.flac
CHC-gamestart-CCAM-Original-M2VA1.flac
CHC-gamestart-CCAM-M2VA4.flac
CHC-Gamestart-YM3438CCAM-M1VA3
CHC-INTRO-YM3438CCAM-Original-M1VA3.flac
Observations:
-This shows once again the background noise Issue I experience with the M2VA1 and M1VA7 CCAM. By opposition VA4 CCAM and stock M1VA6 are clean.
-The PCM voice comes out a bit cleaner on the CCAM.
-The "sweeping" sound immediately at the beginning is pretty harsh on an unfiltered -original - CCAM. Adjusting low pass on a CCAM is tricky as all games are not made equal.
-Sonic 2 : Emerald Hill 1
Ok I choose this one because I felt that I basically "had" to include some sonic in my test run but honestly I think this is probably the less interesting sample series. It is loud en eventful enough to hide noise issues, seems to be coming out well pretty much all the time.
Sonic2-Emerald1-VA3(postrecap).flac *This recording has CRT whine noise due to connected CRT.
Sonic2-Emerald1-CCAM-M1VA7.flac
Sonic2-emerald1-CCAM-M2VA1.flac
Sonic2-emerald1-CCAM-Original-M2VA1.flac
Sonic2-emerald1-CCAM-M2VA4.flac
Sonic2-Emerald1-YM3438CCAM-M1VA3
Sonic2-Emerald1-YM3438CCAM-Original-M1VA3.flac
Observations:
-This would need to be confirmed but I experienced some sound glitches on the M2VA4. Once in a while it would output a small patch of white noise or some similar glitch sound. It is not on the recording as it does not appear all the time. Might be caused by a problem with my cart or motherboard too, do not know. Would require more play time on the VA4.
*While it is good on both CCAM and old model1, I prefer CCAM just a little bit. It just comes out Nicer and smoother.
Notes on the hardware setup.
-Retrogamer343's CCAM board; It is the very CCAM board I used in my recordings.
-A look at the overall setup:
This is my M2VA4 board but I used exactly the same configuration for all my CCAM tests. A naked board with a separate CCAM connected with Shielded cables kept far from the board. In the case of the M1VA7 and M2VA1 I had to play around with the orientation of the CCAM section relatively to the console motherboard to minimize interferences. All my recordings were done with a configuration where I deemed the interferences "minimized". There was no such problem with the M2Va4. The thing was silent, period.
Things to do/investigate at this point. (11/08/2013)
-Get more recordings, especially of rarer stock consoles.
-See how to best restore the PSG level in the VA4 CCAM.
-Test some other audio mods, such as the volume balance fix for va2,2.3 and possibly some other amp designs.
-Make an overall sound rating of each consoles, including mod solutions. ( needs more data )







_%5BHack_by_MIJET_v20080924%5D_(Enhanced_Editon)-1.png)



Reply With Quote




