Quantcast

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 46 of 46

Thread: Pac-Man on Atari 2600

  1. #46
    End of line.. Shining Hero gamevet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    10,401
    Rep Power
    143

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spiffyone View Post
    Agreed. The market simply wanted new hardware product at affordable prices. ColecoVision was doing fine, but Coleco had heavily invested in the 2600 market for software and didn't have the stomach to stick out the dwindling demand for that hardware. 5200 was too expensive and problematic. Then, of course, there was the rise of the home computer, best exemplified by Commodore 64, but also the earlier VIC-20 which Commodore marketed more directly against video game consoles (why buy a video game system when you can get a Commodore?), going so far as to offer rebates on Commodore computers with the trade in of a video game system iirc.
    Coleco's investment in the horrible Adam computer is what took them out of the market. Maybe if they had kept the Adam separate from the Colecovision, they could have sold a couple more million consoles.
    Last edited by gamevet; 04-01-2014 at 01:58 AM.
    A Black Falcon: no, computer games and video games are NOT the same thing. Video games are on consoles, computer games are on PC. The two kinds of games are different, and have significantly different design styles, distribution methods, and game genre selections. Computer gaming and console (video) gaming are NOT the same thing."



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •