Kimble Justice's coming out story

[Kamahl]

Yes, I'm sure that women LOVE men who tell them how they should dress, act, think, and speak, as if it's still the 1950s. You can do what you want, just as long as you don't try to tell me that I have any privilege that you don't have, or that you're being treated badly by society in the ways that you are, because I'll just shut down, not listen, and accuse you of being one of those "evil feminists" I hate so much!

So what you've got from that post is that somehow women are being told how to dress? You just keep proving my points by being incapable of a rational argument.

Also that wikipedia article is ridiculous, so the male privileges are:
1. Some jobs are assumed to be "male" by default, "he" is the default "word" or whatever something ridiculous. Here in Portugal a fork is male and a knife is female. Did you know that?
2. In backwards places in the word women are still treated backwards (which is bad, but a total shift in goal posts, we're arguing western society)

I'll gladly give up the right to the word "he", lets call each other "it", both men and women. I'm not even being sarcastic how is this an issue?

Allow me to ruin this thread with twitter comments:




















Feminists.

[Lan Di]

So what you've got from that post is that somehow women are being told how to dress? You just keep proving my points by being incapable of a rational argument.

Also that wikipedia article is ridiculous, so the male privileges are:
1. Some jobs are assumed to be "male" by default, "he" is the default "word" or whatever something ridiculous. Here in Portugal a fork is male and a knife is female. Did you know that?
2. In backwards places in the word women are still treated backwards (which is bad, but a total shift in goal posts, we're arguing western society)

I'll gladly give up the right to the word "he", lets call each other "it", both men and women. I'm not even being sarcastic how is this an issue?


Feminists.

The truth.

[A Black Falcon]

Sir, that is political spin. How do you define extreme action? Sandra Fluke petitioning to force tax payers to pay for birth control s extreme action.

Well from this we know that you are an EXTREMELY far right conservative, and that's unfortunate, but in the real world, pretty much the entire Democratic Party supports birth control, including taxpayer funding of birth control. The Democrats are a centrist party; maybe you are confused about this because the Republicans today have gone completely out of their minds and keep pushing farther and farther right, but the Democrats are in few ways truly liberal, unfortunately.

Anyway, support for birth control is the reasonable centrist position. Wanting it banned is the far-edge extremist position. Birth control saves lives and money. Yes, it saves far more than it costs.

[Kamahl]

Please edit your post Lan Di, I already put way too many pics, we don't need them twice (thanks for the support though).

Also put a last one that's pure gold.

[Barone]

Anyway, support for birth control is the reasonable centrist position. Wanting it banned is the far-edge extremist position.

[A Black Falcon]

[IMG]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-3AxrkD7KeWQ/TlmO65a-vzI/AAAAAAAAB-M/2JR34kXPqIY/s320/mao.jpg

So you're a super far right wing nut too? Sad.

[Phexar]

She said anyone who is not a feminist is a bigot.

Bigotry... would she call some trans women bigots? Because some trans women have particular problems with feminism. Why? Because of people like TERF's (Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists), for example. Their name probably already gives you an idea of what kind of people they are:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Trans-e...dical_feminism

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Cathy_Brennan

With people like this in the feminism movement, no wonder they're disillusioned with it. Extremism truly is a poison.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/annanorth/wh...nder-wo#g0u36m

[A Black Falcon]

There are very few TERFs out there. I can understand why they'd feel that way, but they are very outside of the mainstream of anything, feminism included.

[fruitsofherwomb]

I don't even know why people give all these people attention, at least these so called feminist. They are basically trolls, plain and simple then there are the guys that threaten to kill them that are also trolls. But they get their messages reposted on online messages boards and tumblr to receive that attention they desire. Once everyone blocks their idiotic accounts and ignore them, they will crawl back to their pathetic lives and continue to post their sexualized selfies on their instagram in hopes that someone gives them attention.

[AdamL]

Individually, between one person and another, of course not being racist or sexist is very well served by treating everyone equally. But societal, and in law, it is not. If you treat everyone "equally" but some people have inherent advantages, by being "equal" what you do is perpetuate the current system of advantages. By "treating everyone equally", what you do is continue to treat straight white men better than any other group, because that group has all the power. You need to force equality in order to break down that kind of system, and that requires helping disadvantaged groups. Because of inbuilt societal discrimination they need the help in order to begin to level the playing field.

Yes, I'm sure that women LOVE men who tell them how they should dress, act, think, and speak, as if it's still the 1950s. You can do what you want, just as long as you don't try to tell me that I have any privilege that you don't have, or that you're being treated badly by society in the ways that you are, because I'll just shut down, not listen, and accuse you of being one of those "evil feminists" I hate so much!

Well from this we know that you are an EXTREMELY far right conservative, and that's unfortunate, but in the real world, pretty much the entire Democratic Party supports birth control, including taxpayer funding of birth control. The Democrats are a centrist party; maybe you are confused about this because the Republicans today have gone completely out of their minds and keep pushing farther and farther right, but the Democrats are in few ways truly liberal, unfortunately.

Anyway, support for birth control is the reasonable centrist position. Wanting it banned is the far-edge extremist position. Birth control saves lives and money. Yes, it saves far more than it costs.

LOL, cognitive dissonance much?

Here you are advocating the use of violence to force your will on other people and tell them how they should act, think, and speak, and it's the people who are objecting to this act of aggression you want to commit against them that are the "extremists"?

It's not shocking that you also want to rob people to pay for random strangers' sexual habits. Your ilk has never been able to grasp the fact that OTHER PEOPLE ARE NOT YOUR PROPERTY and their belongings aren't yours to take and give away as you please. I only wish you fascist far-left loons would stop hiding your sociopathic personalities behind your Daddy Gubbermint and come steal from me face-to-face.

So in conclussion, fuck you and the horse you rode in on.

Sincerely,
An extreme far-right anarchist.

[SEGA.GENESIS1989]

Ah, Anita Sarkeesian. After watching her videos, I`ve come to the realization that she treats the subject matter as positional papers: gathering poritions of so called evidence that supports her position on any given topic even though the evidence taken in its totality discounts her assertions or stance. Unfortunately she has shut down the comments section of each of her videos so viewers cannot properly assess whether her assertions are correct. And it`s my belief that she has done this purposefully in order to censor any rebuttal from viewers. not being able to refute her assertions can be quite infuriating. And I think that is a contributing factor as to why she`s recieved so much backlash. Luckily, if you do a quick search online you can find some of those rebuttals.

[Lan Di]

Well from this we know that you are an EXTREMELY far right conservative, and that's unfortunate, but in the real world, pretty much the entire Democratic Party supports birth control, including taxpayer funding of birth control. The Democrats are a centrist party; maybe you are confused about this because the Republicans today have gone completely out of their minds and keep pushing farther and farther right, but the Democrats are in few ways truly liberal, unfortunately.

Anyway, support for birth control is the reasonable centrist position. Wanting it banned is the far-edge extremist position. Birth control saves lives and money. Yes, it saves far more than it costs.

Thanks for your ad hominem attack. You just proved how tolerant and stable minded you are. Insults and intimidation are exactly what feminists experts at doing.

The Democratic Party is centrist? Are you serious? Constant tax hikes, entitlements, welfare for illegal immigrants, driver’s licenses for illegal immigrants, banning plastic grocery bags, pro amnesty, pro affirmative action, ant-christian, pro-sharia law, forcing Americans to have health insurance with the ultimate penalty of jail (tax evasion) all constructs of the Democratic Party. You gotta be kidding me. You can’t spend your way to prosperity. Look at Chicago, Detroit, and St Louis. All DNC controlled cities that have obliterated prosperity all in the name of entitlements, taxation and out of control unions.

Extreme right is...
1. Pro anarchy
2. Anti LEGAL immigration
3. Pro church and state.
4. Zero welfare

Those are just a few examples of far right and I am none of those. I believe in legal marijuana, legal prostitution, pro raising the minimum wage ($15per hour is too much though), and all forms of speech and free expression. Does that sound like a far right guy to you?
You need to rethink your argument instead of trying to make a fool out of me and miserably failing while attempting to do so.

Please edit your post Lan Di, I already put way too many pics, we don't need them twice (thanks for the support though).

Done.

[A Black Falcon]

LOL, cognitive dissonance much?

Here you are advocating the use of violence to force your will on other people and tell them how they should act, think, and speak, and it's the people who are objecting to this act of aggression you want to commit against them that are the "extremists"?

I know you must be intentionally misreading things in order to intentionally completely 'misunderstand' me, but try reading that quote you highlighted again. If you can't tell that I'm saying 'that is what Kamahl is saying, and it's horribly wrong", then try again.


As for the rest, government is a good thing. Not everything it does is good, but government in general is.

Ah, Anita Sarkeesian. After watching her videos, I`ve come to the realization that she treats the subject matter as positional papers: gathering poritions of so called evidence that supports her position on any given topic even though the evidence taken in its totality discounts her assertions or stance.

Thie evidence she cites actually fully supports her positions in pretty much every example.

Unfortunately she has shut down the comments section of each of her videos so viewers cannot properly assess whether her assertions are correct. And it`s my belief that she has done this purposefully in order to censor any rebuttal from viewers. not being able to refute her assertions can be quite infuriating. And I think that is a contributing factor as to why she`s recieved so much backlash. Luckily, if you do a quick search online you can find some of those rebuttals.

No, she disables comments in order to not have to read through mountains of violently sexist diatribes agaisnt her. It's entirely reasonable and understandable. Also, she's far from the only popular Youtuber who disables comments -- TotalBiscuit has also mostly disabled comments, for example.

Thanks for your ad hominem attack. You just proved how tolerant and stable minded you are. Insults and intimidation are exactly what feminists experts at doing.

The Democratic Party is centrist? Are you serious? Constant tax hikes, entitlements, welfare for illegal immigrants, driver’s licenses for illegal immigrants, banning plastic grocery bags, pro amnesty, pro affirmative action, ant-christian, pro-sharia law, forcing Americans to have health insurance with the ultimate penalty of jail (tax evasion) all constructs of the Democratic Party. You gotta be kidding me. You can’t spend your way to prosperity. Look at Chicago, Detroit, and St Louis. All DNC controlled cities that have obliterated prosperity all in the name of entitlements, taxation and out of control unions.

Extreme right is...
1. Pro anarchy
2. Anti LEGAL immigration
3. Pro church and state.
4. Zero welfare

Those are just a few examples of far right and I am none of those. I believe in legal marijuana, legal prostitution, pro raising the minimum wage ($15per hour is too much though), and all forms of speech and free expression. Does that sound like a far right guy to you?
You need to rethink your argument instead of trying to make a fool out of me and miserably failing while attempting to do so.

This post is pretty crazy, I can't quite wrap my head around how you manage to first list off an insane super-right-wing list of far-right wrong opinions, and then at the end you say that you support some liberal positions. So why are some moderate or liberal positions the most evil things ever, and others are fine? That makes no sense. That first paragraph quoted is very far right. The last one is not.

Oh, and as for pro-anarchy in that middle paragraph, I was referring to actual politicians, not militia nuts and stuff, and the right wing of today's Republican party is most definitely not pro-anarchy. What they are in favor of is corporations and states having more power than the federal government, which is a very different thing. They legislate towards corporate governance, not anarchy.


Anyway, if you look at a political spectrum, Democrats mostly fall slightly left of center, or in the center, while the Republicans today are far to the right. The Democratic party has stayed about the same or become slightly more conservative over the past 20 years, but during that same time the Republicans have gone very, VERY far right, so it makes it seem like Democratic politicians are much, MUCH more liberal than they actually are when you don't consider the direction Republicans have gone in in recent years.

There is a liberal wing of the Democratic party, and I hope it grows, but right now it does not have power. Obama ran as something of a liberal, but has governed as a centrist, frustratingly.

[j_factor]

lol women, amirite?

[Lan Di]

This post is pretty crazy, I can't quite wrap my head around how you manage to first list off an insane super-right-wing list of far-right wrong opinions, and then at the end you say that you support some liberal positions. So why are some moderate or liberal positions the most evil things ever, and others are fine? That makes no sense. That first paragraph quoted is very far right. The last one is not.

Oh, and as for pro-anarchy in that middle paragraph, I was referring to actual politicians, not militia nuts and stuff, and the right wing of today's Republican party is most definitely not pro-anarchy. What they are in favor of is corporations and states having more power than the federal government, which is a very different thing. They legislate towards corporate governance, not anarchy.


Anyway, if you look at a political spectrum, Democrats mostly fall slightly left of center, or in the center, while the Republicans today are far to the right. The Democratic party has stayed about the same or become slightly more conservative over the past 20 years, but during that same time the Republicans have gone very, VERY far right, so it makes it seem like Democratic politicians are much, MUCH more liberal than they actually are when you don't consider the direction Republicans have gone in in recent years.

There is a liberal wing of the Democratic party, and I hope it grows, but right now it does not have power. Obama ran as something of a liberal, but has governed as a centrist, frustratingly.

Are you insane? The first paragraph is an example of far left wing liberal policy drafted by the DNC that is enforced right now, and you call it far right? You seem to be politically tone deaf. So far you have spouted opinion and not fact. I've given you examples of actual leftist liberal policy and you totally distort my argument. You've been drinking some serious leftist political Kool-aid. You are behaving just like a feminist, emotionally charged and intellectually dysfunctional.

1. Each state is sovereign, that is a fact of life. That's why the country is called the Untied States of America. If you don't like one state, move to another. If you want government to run your life from the cradle to the grave, then move to China, Cuba, or North Korea.
2. Your corporate governance argument is severely flawed. You are demeaning the free market and entrepreneurial capitalist spirit of the US. If you over burden the businesses with taxation and regulation and mob-like unions, jobs are sent overseas and unemployment rises. Detroit and Chicago are excellent examples of this. That smart phone you more that likely have is a construct of capitalistic ingenuity, not government entitlement.

I wouldn't be surprised if you were a Ferguson, MO looter or an Occupy Wall Street squatter. Same mentality.