Quantcast

Page 10 of 15 FirstFirst ... 67891011121314 ... LastLast
Results 136 to 150 of 214

Thread: The AVGN is now a white cis male privilage piss-baby man-child racist sexist shitlord

  1. #136
    Raging in the Streets
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,158
    Rep Power
    70

    Default

    Lets be honest, the original 4 Ghostbusters are kinda ugly bastards when you think about it.

    Except for Winston of course, wheeew.

  2. #137
    The Cat in the Hat Shining Hero NeoVamp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    10,706
    Rep Power
    208

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gogogadget View Post
    Except for Winston of course, wheeew.
    Good save!


  3. #138
    Banned by Administrators
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    spaghetti
    Age
    43
    Posts
    5,991
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Oh wow, the release of the new Ghostbusters is sooner then expected! 15 of this month! It already premiered in LA;

    Ghostbusters
    2016 ‧ Fantasy/Science fiction film ‧ 1h 57m

    3.8/10
    IMDb

    78%
    Rotten Tomatoes

    63%
    Metacritic
    https://www.google.ca/search?q=WATCH...q=Ghostbusters

    Ghostbusters has received mixed to positive reviews, with many critics praising the cast (particularly Jones and McKinnon), while criticizing the pacing and editing.[37][38][39][40][41][42] On review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes the film has a rating of 77%, based on 84 reviews, with an average rating of 6.5/10. The site's critical consensus reads, "Ghostbusters does an impressive job of standing on its own as a freewheeling, marvelously cast supernatural comedy — even if it can't help but pale somewhat in comparison with the classic original."[43] On Metacritic the film has a score of 59 out of 100, based on 28 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews".[44]
    Mike Ryan of Uproxx gave the film a positive review, saying: "when Ghostbusters focuses on the team and the characters (always Feig’s strength), it flourishes. It’s only when it gets bogged down in CGI ghosts that, sometimes, it starts to drag. But, this is 2016 and a summer action movie needs to keep moving."[45]
    Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times gave the film one out of four stars, lambasting it for containing "bad acting," as well as "cheesy special effects" and a "terrible script."[46] The Village Voice said the film "suffers from the anxiety of influence" of the original, but praised the actors.[47]
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghostbusters_(2016_film)


  4. #139
    Come dance on my floor Master of Shinobi Crystalpepsifan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Burnaby
    Posts
    1,558
    Rep Power
    64

    Default

    I'm going to reserve judgement until I've seen it.

  5. #140
    Banned by Administrators
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    spaghetti
    Age
    43
    Posts
    5,991
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    You going to watch it in theaters?

  6. #141
    Raging in the Streets
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,158
    Rep Power
    70

    Default

    78% on RT isn't bad

  7. #142
    Banned by Administrators
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    spaghetti
    Age
    43
    Posts
    5,991
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    The juicy reviews are always from the everyday viewers, not critics. (WARNING, some spoilers, but I think all of them have warnings in the vid)


  8. #143
    Raging in the Streets
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,158
    Rep Power
    70

    Default

    The one man whos critical opinion I generally trust, Richard Roeper tore this shit apart.

    Well there it is.

  9. #144
    Banned by Administrators
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    spaghetti
    Age
    43
    Posts
    5,991
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gogogadget View Post
    The one man whos critical opinion I generally trust, Richard Roeper tore this shit apart.

    Well there it is.
    Yes, I already read that too. http://chicago.suntimes.com/entertai...rrifying-mess/

  10. #145
    The Cat in the Hat Shining Hero NeoVamp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    10,706
    Rep Power
    208

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thief View Post
    The juicy reviews are always from the everyday viewers, not critics.

    That's because the critics get paid by the companies to not hate on it, I read in the news how cunts like pewdiepie take bribes not to hate on games by certain companies.

    Oh man, I can't wait till time washes away this shitbusters memory. just like it did with that new Robocop movie.

  11. #146
    Raging in the Streets
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,158
    Rep Power
    70

    Default

    That PewDiePie scandal was the fucking weirdest, Warner Brothers paid him money to give a good review to Shadow of Mordor.

    A game that is actually really good anyway? Ben Croshaw (who doesn't get paid jack shit by any company other than Escapist) listed it in his Top 5 games of the year, and he's notorious for giving game bad reviews.

    Based on the reviews i've seen of this, the director (Paul Feig of course) is good, and the cast themselves are usually quite funny and have good chemistry so it's not them either, so we can blame the writers for this mess. I guess i'll catch it when it's not in cinemas and see if it's worth hating on.

  12. #147
    Raging in the Streets xelement5x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Southwest USA
    Age
    43
    Posts
    4,505
    Rep Power
    79

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Crystalpepsifan View Post
    I'm going to reserve judgement until I've seen it.
    This is how I feel. But I'm not going to pay to see it, I will wait until it's on Netflix or at the library.
    Quote Originally Posted by StarMist View Post
    A spine card is the hymen of a new game assuring its first owner that he is truly her one and only, and of a used game assuring its new owner that whilst she has been played with in the past that play has never been too careless or thorough.

  13. #148
    Banned by Administrators
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    spaghetti
    Age
    43
    Posts
    5,991
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xelement5x View Post
    This is how I feel. But I'm not going to pay to see it, I will wait until it's on Netflix or at the library.
    Or when the Pirates help us.

    Last edited by Thief; 07-13-2016 at 03:54 PM.

  14. #149
    Raging in the Streets
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,158
    Rep Power
    70

    Default

    Oh no, I could never pirate anything!

    I will wait until I can obtain a digital copy of this movie, through one of the many available services that I can access.

  15. #150
    Stuck in the Past Shining Hero The Jackal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    14,480
    Rep Power
    167

    Default

    If this flops over in the West, any chance they have of it still being saved in other territories is unlikely - it just got banned over in China, which as some of you might not know, is the "no. 2 film market". Apparently.

    Sony must be sweating bricks right now.

    http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/new...e-china-910563

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •