Lets be honest, the original 4 Ghostbusters are kinda ugly bastards when you think about it.
Except for Winston of course, wheeew.
Lets be honest, the original 4 Ghostbusters are kinda ugly bastards when you think about it.
Except for Winston of course, wheeew.
Oh wow, the release of the new Ghostbusters is sooner then expected! 15 of this month! It already premiered in LA;
https://www.google.ca/search?q=WATCH...q=GhostbustersGhostbusters
2016 ‧ Fantasy/Science fiction film ‧ 1h 57m
3.8/10
IMDb
78%
Rotten Tomatoes
63%
Metacritic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghostbusters_(2016_film)Ghostbusters has received mixed to positive reviews, with many critics praising the cast (particularly Jones and McKinnon), while criticizing the pacing and editing.[37][38][39][40][41][42] On review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes the film has a rating of 77%, based on 84 reviews, with an average rating of 6.5/10. The site's critical consensus reads, "Ghostbusters does an impressive job of standing on its own as a freewheeling, marvelously cast supernatural comedy — even if it can't help but pale somewhat in comparison with the classic original."[43] On Metacritic the film has a score of 59 out of 100, based on 28 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews".[44]
Mike Ryan of Uproxx gave the film a positive review, saying: "when Ghostbusters focuses on the team and the characters (always Feig’s strength), it flourishes. It’s only when it gets bogged down in CGI ghosts that, sometimes, it starts to drag. But, this is 2016 and a summer action movie needs to keep moving."[45]
Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times gave the film one out of four stars, lambasting it for containing "bad acting," as well as "cheesy special effects" and a "terrible script."[46] The Village Voice said the film "suffers from the anxiety of influence" of the original, but praised the actors.[47]
![]()
I'm going to reserve judgement until I've seen it.
You going to watch it in theaters?
78% on RT isn't bad
The juicy reviews are always from the everyday viewers, not critics. (WARNING, some spoilers, but I think all of them have warnings in the vid)
The one man whos critical opinion I generally trust, Richard Roeper tore this shit apart.
Well there it is.
Yes, I already read that too. http://chicago.suntimes.com/entertai...rrifying-mess/
That's because the critics get paid by the companies to not hate on it, I read in the news how cunts like pewdiepie take bribes not to hate on games by certain companies.
Oh man, I can't wait till time washes away this shitbusters memory. just like it did with that new Robocop movie.
That PewDiePie scandal was the fucking weirdest, Warner Brothers paid him money to give a good review to Shadow of Mordor.
A game that is actually really good anyway? Ben Croshaw (who doesn't get paid jack shit by any company other than Escapist) listed it in his Top 5 games of the year, and he's notorious for giving game bad reviews.
Based on the reviews i've seen of this, the director (Paul Feig of course) is good, and the cast themselves are usually quite funny and have good chemistry so it's not them either, so we can blame the writers for this mess. I guess i'll catch it when it's not in cinemas and see if it's worth hating on.
Oh no, I could never pirate anything!
I will wait until I can obtain a digital copy of this movie, through one of the many available services that I can access.
If this flops over in the West, any chance they have of it still being saved in other territories is unlikely - it just got banned over in China, which as some of you might not know, is the "no. 2 film market". Apparently.
Sony must be sweating bricks right now.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/new...e-china-910563
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)