Intel was pretty rigorous in rebranding the chips from 2017 onwards to Intel PSG though. I would maybe buy into the "there was still new old stock available when he got the chips" argument, but that wouldn't explain the yet even older spansion flash memory. Also, both chips were (even are) still available under the Intel PSG/Cypress branding. (also I know from an industry perspective that many users were very wary when Intel announced to discontinue the Altera name, and they went very quickly about that). So availability wasn't an issue, the chips could still be gotten brand new under the new names. There are many rather sketchy 'distributors' listing them under the old names though, virtually all of them located in Asia or South America...
And the reason I am harping on this is probably the very same reason why some people (yourself included) have issues with their games even on supposedly supported hardware. It's simply because used chips (the industry even tends to call such chips 'plagiarized' since they aren't sold with consent of the IP holder) have a higher failure rate than new stock! Yes, the chances of corruption or other failure may lie in single digits of percentage, or even as low as, let's say, 0.5% (going by some sources). But that would still mean that one in every 200 Paprium carts might have at least one faulty memory or Fpga chip. And that would definitely explain issues like freezing, especially since I don't believe WM checked whether every single cart can be completed - they probably only checked whether they booted (which they probably still do if only certain registers or LUTs are corrupted).


Reply With Quote





