I'll admit they have great gameplay. I'd actually written that as part of my original post, but edited it out for the sake of sticking to one position. I also played them on the Wii and I was surprised the graphics looked so crisp, almost HD. But I'm sticking with my views that I don't personally root for the whole lego-meets-*insert-franchise* presentation. I'd take the real deal anyday.
To use a better analogy, take Baten Kaitos on the Game Cube, for instance. It looks beautiful and it plays beautifully; but I'd rather play a conventional turn-based RPG than a trading card game RPG (if you haven't played it, it follows the trading card formula during battle mode).
I'm actually one for the mixing of genres. I love it when I see different engines at play in games; moving from a beat'em up to a shmup level (Death and Return of Superman) or from a Fighting RPG to a shmup level (Revengers of Vengeance), etc. I guess what I don't like is "real world + game" mashups; like trading cards + RPG game, or Lego + adventure game. To be more specific, what these sort of unions do for me is that they tend to disassociate me from the intended genres (i.e.- Star Wars, Batman; or a beatiful RPG storyline, in the case of Baten Kaitos). For me, it's like watching a really engaging movie, but something suddenly jerks you back to reality.
At any rate, I feel now like I used the wrong analogy originally, because I actually did like Beowulf. In fact, I had just finished watching it for a fourth time before I wrote that post. Like I said, the story is great, even though I still think they could've gone the live-action route with all the resources spent.
I loved Outlander, just like The 13th Warrior. I like just about everything Beowulf-related (which is probably why my favorite writer is Tolkien). The only exception for me is probably Neil Gaiman (e.g.- American Gods). Present day re-enactments are so overplayed. I prefer my time pieces as such, thank you very much (and I don't mean time pieces involving the present, like Timeline or Just Visiting, which I loved).
I'm about 50-50 with Neil Gaiman, myself. I tend to like about half his stories and about half the content of his stories. The thing is, he reads like a Paulo Coelho meets Michael Crichton (contemporary ultra-realistic fantasy meets borderline vulgar SciFi). I'm not sure if you get what I'm saying.


Reply With Quote


