Most annoying T.V. personalites

[Tanegashima]

Okay, I have to rant, now that I'm home and on a semi-normal sleeping schedule I was watching day-time t.v. for the first time in months while doing homework and I realized why I stopped watching t.v.:

Chris Angel: Okay, this guy is douche-bag number 1, total arrogant asshole. I hate this guy, I hATE him. I mean this guy like took asshole classes when he was a kid, I swear. Anybody who constantly repeats: "I just gotta stay focussed, focus is so important, I have to be focused, I'm an expert at focus, I just am so good at focus." HE IS A MORON!

Bill Kurtis: I hate rhetorical questions and this dude is the KING of rhetorical questions.
"Can criminals ever be credible witnesses?" "Is this a problem facing American Justice? Only time will tell...."

Regis Philbin: Need I say more? His constant gesticulations drive me insane!

Any gameshow host: they are all jackasses, period. Alex Trebek (however you spell it) is or comes of as a pretentious ass on jeopardy.

Oprah Winfrey: Windbag queen. Another rhetorical question kingpin, preachy preachy preachy! Dr. Phill too!

[Iron Lizard]

Keith Olbermann-Smug asshole. Ironically I agree with much of what he has to say but his delivery is so damn annoying. He also wears the stereotypical pinstriped liberal uniform.

[MrMatthews]

I know he's not exactly a TV personality, but can I at least get Charlie Sheen in with an honorable mention? After all, his Hollywood career has gone the way of emilio, so he's pretty much sunk down to primetime. Next stop on Charlie's elevator to obscurity: infommercials!

2 and a Half Men, indeed. It should be called A Man, A Kid, and a Smirky, Talentless Bottom-Feeder With a Personality Too Insipid For Any Role to Mask.

[Metal_Sonic]

I know he's not exactly a TV personality, but can I at least get Charlie Sheen in with an honorable mention? After all, his Hollywood career has gone the way of emilio, so he's pretty much sunk down to primetime. Next stop on Charlie's elevator to obscurity: infommercials!

2 and a Half Men, indeed. It should be called A Man, A Kid, and a Smirky, Talentless Bottom-Feeder With a Personality Too Insipid For Any Role to Mask.

*Has seen Platoon*

[MrMatthews]

*Has seen Platoon*

Willem Dafoe was great, wasn't he?

[Rusty Venture]

2 and a Half Men, indeed. It should be called A Man, A Kid, and a Smirky, Talentless Bottom-Feeder With a Personality Too Insipid For Any Role to Mask.

That is no way to talk about Jon Cryer!

[Dirt Ball Gamer]

Okay, I have to rant, now that I'm home and on a semi-normal sleeping schedule I was watching day-time t.v. for the first time in months while doing homework and I realized why I stopped watching t.v.:

Chris Angel: Okay, this guy is douche-bag number 1, total arrogant asshole. I hate this guy, I hATE him. I mean this guy like took asshole classes when he was a kid, I swear. Anybody who constantly repeats: "I just gotta stay focussed, focus is so important, I have to be focused, I'm an expert at focus, I just am so good at focus." HE IS A MORON!

Bill Kurtis: I hate rhetorical questions and this dude is the KING of rhetorical questions.
"Can criminals ever be credible witnesses?" "Is this a problem facing American Justice? Only time will tell...."

Regis Philbin: Need I say more? His constant gesticulations drive me insane!

Any gameshow host: they are all jackasses, period. Alex Trebek (however you spell it) is or comes of as a pretentious ass on jeopardy.

Oprah Winfrey: Windbag queen. Another rhetorical question kingpin, preachy preachy preachy! Dr. Phill too!

Bless you tanegashima! I thought I was the only person who absolutly loathes that Chris Angel mofo. If he would just keep his mouth shut and do magic I would have no problem with the guy, but he just goes around in his wifebeater acting like some mondo hipster jerkoff. God I hate him. He can't just do the stupid trick he has to ham things up and talk about how awesome he is. Douche-bag #1 with a bullet. Miiiind Freeeaaak yeah yeah yeh! God his show sucks. If Raul Julia was around today he would show that pansy what being hardcore is all about and crush his windpipe with a headbutt and then crush his balls with his M.Bison steel toe boots

[17daysolderthannes]

...and that's why I avoid daytime TV at all costs. You have just named the exact reason that during the summer my sleep schedule is 6A.M.-2P.M., because there is nothing happening between those hours worth being up for. The only shows I watch nowadays are Scrubs, Family Guy, Futurama, The Simpsons, and South Park. Occasionally I also watch vintage, GOOD sitcoms like Full House, Home Improvement, and a few others when they come on TV Land or Nick at Nite. Everything else is reality bullshit, talkshow bullshit, news bullshit, GOD AWFUL sitcom bullshit, or just a big hunk of bullshit (Mythbusters is not science).

[MrMatthews]

.(Mythbusters is not science).

This show was actually pretty entertaining for the first few seasons (before it got really campy). But I do question some of their "findings"

[TheEdge]

I also dislike Chris Angel, he is so cheesy and overly dramatic. Also his magic tricks are retarded and so fake. You know all those people he approaches "randomly" are in on it. Also you can make anything look sensational on TV. One last thing, his stupid family always starts crying and being all scared but its just a dumb trick. I hate modern television. I hate modern everything....

[17daysolderthannes]

This show was actually pretty entertaining for the first few seasons (before it got really campy). But I do question some of their "findings"

oh definitely, I'm a MCHE major and watching their show just makes me go "oh for fucks sake!" They do a very specific experiment, usually heavily flawed, and then try to not only claim a result for a larger idea but also that their crappy experiment once and for all proves myth or true. Bullshit. Nowadays they don't even test stuff worth testing, they just take any stupid myth they hear because it allows them to blow something up. There was a myth with 2 18 wheelers running head on with a "sub compact" between them and the sub compact "fusing" the 18 wheelers so the whole thing could be towed off as one piece. First of all, what a pointless myth to test. Second of all, are you fucking stupid? of course that wouldn't work, thats retarded. Third of all, the cars involved weren't specified, they just took 2 old 18 wheelers and some random shitty small car and acted like they were perfectly recreating the scenario. Unless you have EVERYTHING EXACT as it was in the myth, you are not testing it, you are just performing the scientific equivalent of jacking off. Now, on the other hand, if they changed the premise of the show to where they admitted that they just did the best they could and that they could never really know 100% whether or not any myth was true, that would be fine, there's nothing wrong trying to recreate the results of something you've heard, but the way they try to act like their shitty experiments are scientific law makes me want to pull my hair out and scream.

[Iron Lizard]

I just get annoyed with them when they do not do any simple research before they waste thousands of dollars on some experiment. The shooting into the air one was an example. This had been in the news. Its well known. And why must they destroy nice cars. They killed a Vette, that neat Toyota Corona, 2 Impalas, and am sure others. I just don't get it. Why not destroy a piece of shit. A rocket on the back of a 1981 Crown Vic would work just as well as on a 67 Impala.

[MrMatthews]

oh definitely, I'm a MCHE major and watching their show just makes me go "oh for fucks sake!" They do a very specific experiment, usually heavily flawed, and then try to not only claim a result for a larger idea but also that their crappy experiment once and for all proves myth or true. Bullshit. Nowadays they don't even test stuff worth testing, they just take any stupid myth they hear because it allows them to blow something up. There was a myth with 2 18 wheelers running head on with a "sub compact" between them and the sub compact "fusing" the 18 wheelers so the whole thing could be towed off as one piece. First of all, what a pointless myth to test. Second of all, are you fucking stupid? of course that wouldn't work, thats retarded. Third of all, the cars involved weren't specified, they just took 2 old 18 wheelers and some random shitty small car and acted like they were perfectly recreating the scenario. Unless you have EVERYTHING EXACT as it was in the myth, you are not testing it, you are just performing the scientific equivalent of jacking off. Now, on the other hand, if they changed the premise of the show to where they admitted that they just did the best they could and that they could never really know 100% whether or not any myth was true, that would be fine, there's nothing wrong trying to recreate the results of something you've heard, but the way they try to act like their shitty experiments are scientific law makes me want to pull my hair out and scream.

I never saw that one, but I've actually heard that myth. The way I heard it, the only way anyone figured out there was a car between the two semis was by the stench of the rotting corpses in the car.

These two guys aren't scientists. Are they smart? Yes (especially Jamie). They should focus the show around Jamie's robots and remote controlled police cars.

BTW - did you see the episode where they tested the myth that a sinking ship can pull you under water?

[j_factor]

Billy Mays. Fuck that guy.

And most of the people on Fox News.

[KenshiroX]

I don't watch much tv, but I agree with a great deal of you.

What was amazing, however, was the game Smash TV's announcer.

"Total Carnage! I love it!"
"Good luck! You'll need it!"
"I'd buy that for a dollar!"
"Big money! Big prizes! I love it!"