I know I had to manually select the non-HDMI audio device for sound once I put the new card in my PC.
I know I had to manually select the non-HDMI audio device for sound once I put the new card in my PC.
The smell of scorched oil hangs in the air as a premonition of danger, while the engine gloriously shouts its war cry...
Throughout history, suspicion has always bred conflict. The real conflict, though, resides in people's hearts. This conflict has just begun.
nes x-men nes x-men nes x-men
They might have taken the driver out. Perhaps because the system already has Tosslink on it, and using the Macs sound system might sound better than the ATI's (and is tied to the system and not some external source).
![]()
Customized Sega Genesis Model 1 - VA3. Energy efficient with buck converters instead of LM7805's.
That makes Sense that Apple wouldn't want the feature in because they already have their own and having the feature there just makes things more complicated. Ie having the audio come out of the Video card while your hooked out of the onboard audio and vice versa you get no sound and have to change your sound device options. No point in having it on a mac. On a PC its nice because you can add HDMI w audio to a motherboard that didn't come with digital audio output.
I just wish the 7.1 on the HD 4000 series supported DTS-HD and whatever Dolby calls their HD Audio.
Oh well... someday...
Keep in mind I wouldn't use it, but it would have made the HD4000 series even sweeter.
The smell of scorched oil hangs in the air as a premonition of danger, while the engine gloriously shouts its war cry...
Throughout history, suspicion has always bred conflict. The real conflict, though, resides in people's hearts. This conflict has just begun.
nes x-men nes x-men nes x-men
My 360 outputs 720p or 1080i over component cables as well, but as soon as you playback a DVD from the drive, it will down grade the signal to 480p. My HD set shows me the incoming signal mode. For streaming media(media share) it'll upscale it just fine. It's about some stupid rule the movie association wanting to control content over HD signals. Component doesn't have a copyprotection flag like HDMI spec has, thus they have no control over you recording from that source. Why it applies to DVD that are low res anyway? I have no idea.
If you have a HD-DVD that's really output 720p over component, I'm surprised. Even a lot of DVD players that upscaled to HD signal only do it through HDMI.
I've heard that a lot of other HD devices like set top decoders and such only output a true HD signal via HDMI only. Anything on component is downgraded to 480p.
Come to think of it, windows media player is the same. It won't output in full screen at higher res until the output connection is HDMI ( or maybe even DVI - I forget). Something like that (I don't pipe media player to the TV anymore).
Here in Orlando, our HD cable boxes output HD on Component... Lucky us...
Customized Sega Genesis Model 1 - VA3. Energy efficient with buck converters instead of LM7805's.
I can see why they'd do that, since everyone has at least one burned movie on DVD. My upscaling DVD player would only do 1080i/720p through the HDMI cable.
There are upscaling DVD players that will do 720p/1080i via component.
It's the 360 HD-DVD player, and I've had it hooked up with component and HDMI; the picture looks the same either way.If you have a HD-DVD that's really output 720p over component, I'm surprised. Even a lot of DVD players that upscaled to HD signal only do it through HDMI.
If you were only talking about the upscale of DVDs, then the answer is a defineate no for the 360 HD-DVD player and the PS3 via component.
My Verizon Fios HD-DVR does 1080i through component.I've heard that a lot of other HD devices like set top decoders and such only output a true HD signal via HDMI only. Anything on component is downgraded to 480p.![]()
Last edited by gamevet; 11-25-2008 at 02:01 AM.
Sorry for bumping an oldish topic.
I'm thinking about getting a VGA box for my Dreamcast but my TV doesn't have a VGA port. Anything I can do (besides getting a new TV)?
DVI-A is a more recent port that accepts VGA, and DVI-I is compatible as well.
Check if your TV is compatible to one of these. DVI-D wouldn't work, but most TVs have DVI-I (which accepts DVI-D + DVI-A).
If your TV doesn't have a compatible DVI port, but HDMI only, consider buying one of these:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...m=380090899807
Dreamcast via VGA is just breath-taking, and it's definitely worth to try to get it to work with your TV. Although the best TVs usually are those with VGA.
Last edited by retrospiel; 12-28-2008 at 12:15 PM.
The Mega Drive was far inferior to the NES in terms of diffusion rate and sales in the Japanese market, though there were ardent Sega users. But in the US and Europe, we knew Sega could challenge Nintendo. We aimed at dominating those markets, hiring experienced staff for our overseas department in Japan, and revitalising Sega of America and the ailing Virgin group in Europe.
Then we set about developing killer games.
- Hayao Nakayama, Mega Drive Collected Works (p. 17)
Many thanks Christuserloeser for the response. Looks like I'll either have to get a new TV or just hook the Dreamcast up to a monitor which would be OK.
So, your TV does not have a DVI nor HDMI port ?
Hooking the Dreamcast up to a monitor is a great solution - if you use a CRT. LCD monitors expect the user to set their PC's desktop to their native resolution, which Dreamcast can't do. It does output VGA (640x480p60 in sweet RGBHV) and nothing else, so it looks very blurry with most LCD monitors.
Modern LCD TVs usually do have a pretty good upscaler which automatically stretches the incoming signal to its native resolution. With the Dreamcast's VGA and its progressive signal the resulting picture usually looks absolutely fantastic.
Even with my brother's cheap Samsung LCD it looks pretty close to what I get on my high quality CRT monitor.
The Mega Drive was far inferior to the NES in terms of diffusion rate and sales in the Japanese market, though there were ardent Sega users. But in the US and Europe, we knew Sega could challenge Nintendo. We aimed at dominating those markets, hiring experienced staff for our overseas department in Japan, and revitalising Sega of America and the ailing Virgin group in Europe.
Then we set about developing killer games.
- Hayao Nakayama, Mega Drive Collected Works (p. 17)
For a monitor a CRT is better, for a TV I would recommend a cheap LCD HDTV with VGA, DVI and HDMI.
The Sony HMD sounds like it'd be a good monitor. Just like most decent CRTs it should give you an excellent picture.
The VGA box itself doesn't do much if anything at all btw., it's the Dreamcast itself that produces the VGA when the box/cable/adapter is connected. The VGA box merely acts as an adapter to connect your monitor and stereo.
Btw, if your TV is a CRT, you might wanna try the RGB-SCART port. That should give you an excellent picture as well (although less sharp than with VGA).
What TV do you have ?
The Mega Drive was far inferior to the NES in terms of diffusion rate and sales in the Japanese market, though there were ardent Sega users. But in the US and Europe, we knew Sega could challenge Nintendo. We aimed at dominating those markets, hiring experienced staff for our overseas department in Japan, and revitalising Sega of America and the ailing Virgin group in Europe.
Then we set about developing killer games.
- Hayao Nakayama, Mega Drive Collected Works (p. 17)
The Mega Drive was far inferior to the NES in terms of diffusion rate and sales in the Japanese market, though there were ardent Sega users. But in the US and Europe, we knew Sega could challenge Nintendo. We aimed at dominating those markets, hiring experienced staff for our overseas department in Japan, and revitalising Sega of America and the ailing Virgin group in Europe.
Then we set about developing killer games.
- Hayao Nakayama, Mega Drive Collected Works (p. 17)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)